Next odd Thursday appears to be GT & Classsic Sports Car.
801 April 13, 2016 4:56 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
802 April 4, 2016 3:25 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
Just a thought about the Ninco, most of the Ninco cars are can driven motors and the black stripe motor is bell end driven. Just an observation. Some companies make motors that can run either way, Scalextric is not one of them.
803 April 3, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I had my Porsche 906, Goose had a Fly 250LM out and Al took a few laps with his Scaley GT40, Oh and Greg had a couple of Fly GT40s out there. That looks to be the popular car. I think Dan was trying out a 917 but I'm not sure. we were starting to get a pretty good crowd by then. My 906 ran great. I put the newer axles and BRM wheels back on my Fly 250LM, so it's not technically eligible at this point, but it sure is more fun at home. My stock wheels are rather wobbly at this point.
I'll try to remember to bring mine to Bill's this week.
804 April 3, 2016 5:50 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I brought a couple of Revell/Monogram cars ( an E Type & Porsche 550) that I had set up just like the Fly cars, but they performed poorly.
805 March 30, 2016 5:56 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I have a couple of extra I can bring.
806 March 27, 2016 12:00 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I hadn't thought of the Sebring chassis, I don't have any of those by Monogram. I have an E type Jag, Mustang, and Porsche 550 that are all front motored FC 130 motors. As for the Sebring chassis, the only motor that fits that is below 20k is the BWA which is way to slow for this class.
807 March 27, 2016 10:12 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
When we first began discussing this class we just happened to be comparing the merits of Scalextric RTR cars to Fly RTR cars so we started to discuss racing these together. I occurs to me that Revell/Monogram also make several cars that fit into the specs that we are considering and with similar tuning could maybe be competitive with the other two. I'm wondering if we want to consider including this brand for the sake of greater variety. There might also be some who would like to participate that already own these and maybe not the others. Just a thought.
808 March 26, 2016 4:00 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
HuH Mitch58: Are you picking on me per you're last comment about Goose hunting???????
No Goose, not picking on you. Just trying to run down what's in front of me, it's just most of the time it appears to be you.
809 March 25, 2016 8:50 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I'm usually one of the guys constantly upgrading and swapping parts just trying to keep up with you faster drivers, and I do like driving a smooth car, but too many upgrades is what happened to our classic sports car and Trans Am classes. I'm all for improvement to the handling of these cars, I suppose the issue is Motors. It appears that Fly and Scalextric get their motors from the same supplier, at least they both show "black stripe" motors as 'Factory" replacement motors. I personally prefer the smooth power band of the H&R Hawk motor.
I pulled the label off of an older Scalextric "Sport"motor the other day, it had a black stripe underneath it. Go figure. If we are considering upgrading axles are we also considering upgrading wheels? Fly wheels won't fit Slot it axles. Another point to consider, many of the Fly cars now have 3D chassis available that take slot it pods. Rules, rules, rules.
I'm just here for the thrill of the chase, or is it Goose hunting?
810 March 24, 2016 11:50 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
The motor in my front motored Scalextric Vette went south already and I replaced it with an H&R Hawk motor, it no longer qualifies, but it sure runs smoother. My Fly Porsche 906 on the other hand runs very well in it's original stock condition. I'm quite happy with it. I have to force myself to leave it on the shelf so I don't wear it out before I need it.
811 March 23, 2016 2:47 pm
Re: park side race way (17 replies, posted in Parkside Raceway)
That looks simple enough, is there a particular chip you recommend? Or is there just one Scaley chip? As far as the body work, I have a Dremel and I'm not afraid to use/abuse it.
812 March 23, 2016 4:44 am
Re: park side race way (17 replies, posted in Parkside Raceway)
Monte, what is involved in installing a chip in a standard Slot it car?
813 March 22, 2016 12:41 pm
Re: Late Model Trans-Am (6 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)
http://northwesttruescaleracers.com/index.cfm All of the specs for the different classes are here. All 1/24 scale.
814 March 22, 2016 6:06 am
Re: NASTE Race No.7 in The Gorge (9 replies, posted in NASTE)
Hey Monte, I have a Parma 1ohm controller that will get you off the line in a hurry, and take you all the way to the first corner. After that it's, well, spectacular.
815 March 21, 2016 9:12 pm
Re: NASTE Race No.7 in The Gorge (9 replies, posted in NASTE)
I have both, the professor motor seems to be tougher regarding getting hooked up wrong, the DS on the other hand is much smoother as far as driving the cars and is a much better feeling controller. That being said several of us have had to send them back to get brake pods replaced, mostly due to hooking them up wrong even for just a moment. Goose seems to have fried one running the older cars with the heavy voltage draw. DiFalco makes one now for about the same price. I've never had one but have never seen any bad press about the product. Rico has one of the older higher end Difalcos that he likes quite a bit.
816 March 20, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Track is almost ready; waiting for warm weather (16 replies, posted in Track)
That looks great Stan, we can hardly wait.
817 March 20, 2016 7:39 am
Re: NASTE Race No.7 in The Gorge (9 replies, posted in NASTE)
Yes Bob, thanks, Chris and I had a great time.
818 March 16, 2016 9:11 pm
Re: WANTED: your old traction magnets! (7 replies, posted in Wanted)
My freezer in the garage is covered with them (it's right next to the workbench). I'll peel some off.
819 March 16, 2016 3:02 pm
Re: NASTE Race No.7 This Saturday 3/19 (6 replies, posted in NASTE)
Good luck with that. :-)
820 March 16, 2016 11:51 am
Re: NASTE Race No.7 This Saturday 3/19 (6 replies, posted in NASTE)
In the trans am, are we using stock rubber tires or urethane tires? I found that with rubber tires the rear magnet position worked best, but with urethane tires on Bobs track you want to move it forward otherwise the front will come out if you get on it hard. That rare condition known as too much traction.
821 March 15, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: park side race way (17 replies, posted in Parkside Raceway)
That's a tough time to try to get to Vancouver from Tigard, but I'll give it a try. Keep us posted.
822 March 11, 2016 10:16 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
Monte, how does that 906 run? I like the looks of those but haven't gotten myself to pull the trigger. I have two bodies, a Strombecker and an Eldon but those won't do me any good here. I might put the Eldon on an MRRC Club chassis just for fun. It would be nice to see something other than Ferraris and Fords.
823 March 11, 2016 7:21 am
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
That particular car has an odd size rim, the center flange is 6.5mm wide, most of my wider tires are either made for a 6.mm flange or are too low profile for the 250GTO.I ordered a couple of tires with a 7mm flange from SCC to give it another go. I'll save the stock ones for you to set into a mold.
824 March 10, 2016 8:57 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
I took my Fly 250LM to Al's . it wants to run 8.7-8.6 with the occasional 8.5. Al's scaley gt40 was running a steady 8.5-8.3. My Fly GT250 was abysmal. It wouldn't get below a 9, but tires were an issue.
825 March 9, 2016 4:37 pm
Re: Odd Thursday Night - New Class Discussion March 2016 (121 replies, posted in NASTE)
Not me Goose,
I have a few front motored cars that I purchased just because I liked the looks of them, but their handling leaves something to be desired. I'll probably go with something in a sidewinder configuration. I have the hacked on Ferrari 250Lm (poor thing). I don't think I need another GT40 (sorry Chris). I'm leaning towards the blue Porsche 906, but it bugs the heck out of me to pay an extra $25 just to get something other than white.
Quick question though, we are talking about Scalextric and Fly cars that ran in Le Mans '71 and earlier, so does that include the Scalextric Corvette from that era? I know it is front motored, but I've never ran one and don't know if they are as clumsy as the rest. They look nice though.