576

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

I'm happy with Odd Saturdays in Vancouver.

577

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

ok, so what is the goal here again please?

578

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Yes.  I think so.  Or weight to power ratio of some sort.

579

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

It occurs to me that another aspect we'll want to control is weight.  Since we'll be using lower powered motors the weight of the car can be a significant issue.  A lighter car will get moving quicker.  We'll move from motor wars to weight wars.

580

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

The best starting point would be the motor list that we published based on Robert Livingston's testing.  It does not include some of the newer motors since he stopped doing this but is certainly a very useful reference.

Slot Car Motor List

581

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Pitiful...  They are spec'd to quite a bit more.

582

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

So is there some manor of motor limit or will there still be a power divide?

583

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

You should consider hiring help.  Find a younger individual to strain their muscles.  A least you should be happy to know you still have muscles.

584

(306 replies, posted in NASTE)

Kick some butt!

Perhaps no faster than a similarly equipped NSR.

586

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

You guys kill me.  Hysterical.  On all accounts.

587

(306 replies, posted in NASTE)

Are there rules pertaining to the horn(s)?  I think a set of moose horns would look awesome.

588

(7 replies, posted in NASTE)

Heck, you were in Arizona, I figured you just brought the cat back some Goldwater...

589

(8 replies, posted in Modifications)

I picked one up last time I was there.

590

(7 replies, posted in NASTE)

I would have been tempted to balance the room by placing it next to the cat's watering hole.

591

(69 replies, posted in Events)

I stand corrected.  Truly... orthopedic hose.

592

(69 replies, posted in Events)

Alright, what happened to the results of the first race?

Had a wonderful time, we'll have to plan another one.

True Mitch.  The ban was only about price.  Since then things have changed significantly.

I bought my Thunderslot Lola for about $60 as a white kit.

In my opinion we should run classes that allow for low-cost entry as well as those that allow for the higher value offerings.  Otherwise we run the danger of warding off the newer members merely on the shock of the sticker price.

For example, you can run an out-of-the-box Slot.It class that allows for removing the magnet and adding a little weight and you can run a Slot.It class that has a lot less restrictions so that you basically rebuild the chassis to be something other than what came out of the box new.  One is easy for beginners to grasp the other not so much.  Yet from 5 feet away they still seem to use the same cars.

I'm all for allowing most any car to run and I'm also for tighter restrictions.  To me the best racing is when we all have similar setups and it comes down to driving skill.

And as always happens, in time the optimal setup becomes apparent and those with the interest will adopt it.  As an example, how many Baby Kings did we start to see after the narrow little Cobra sprang to life?

Chris, the forum does not have a poll but the main site does have that feature, we haven't used it for a while.

Doc, yes keep the ban?

Which one?  GT?

I'm with you there.  It no longer seems unreasonable.

You know I may or may not already have one, right.

http://www.naste.org/members/monte/T-Slot-1.jpg

Well, that's before a few modifications.  Maybe...

So Greg snuck in with a Thunderslot?

600

(306 replies, posted in NASTE)

That looks amazing.  Excellent flame job by Howie.