Yesterday I had the opportunity to meet Rick Branum, and some of the racers that frequent Cape Horn Speedway. Monte, Terry, and I ventured up the Columbia River to Washougal To check out the track and racing action. From my house in Fairview it's only about a 30 minute trip, max. Rick has an excellent race program and the Cape Horn racers are a great bunch of guys! I had a chance to run a few laps, and although I wasn't very fast the Cape Horn guys get around the tight track very quickly! Cape Horn is a 1/24 scale 6 lane track with approximately a 60 to 65 foot lap length. The lanes are spaced at 4 1/2". The lap counting timing is handled by a SRT system using a dead stip trigger. Cape Horn car classes are based on "flexi" type chassis using lexan bodies. The track is in Rick's basement and Rick has very nice spacious pit areas set up. Cape Horn is an excellent place to race and have a great time! I'd like to thank Rick and all the guys for their hospitallity! I'm looking forward to my next trip to Cape Horn and get in some racing! Also on my next trip to Cape Horn I'll take along some of the cars NASTE uses for IROC races. Rick will be hosting a NASTE race for the 2009 season. Thanks Rick! ---------------------------Bill
5,577 July 17, 2008 9:10 pm
Re: Naste jelopy class (10 replies, posted in Cars)
Hello Todd M, Glad to see you stop in! Man I love those cars of yours! Good news for us, exchanged emails with Doug and he's going to host a NASTE race at Pelican Park this coming season! I'm really looking forward to getting down there and racing with you guys! ----------------------Bill
5,578 July 15, 2008 8:02 pm
Re: Track Design Contest (39 replies, posted in Track)
Looks like Monte is still in the lead....................NO CHALLENGERS?????? Am I going to have to announce the prizes to generate interest?????? --------------Bill
5,579 July 14, 2008 8:02 am
Re: New track for NASTE 2009 race schedule. (5 replies, posted in Track)
Hello Rick, I think either one of our other members or I talked with you some time back. Anyway, I remember hearing about your track, I just failed to contact you. We would love to schedule a race on your track for our 2009 racing season. We usually start up sometime in September. I will plan on coming up for your race on the 20th and we can discuss it further. Would you mind emailing me your address and directions? My email address is; wb0s@hotmail.com Thanks! ---------------Bill
5,580 July 12, 2008 8:37 am
Re: Track Design Contest (39 replies, posted in Track)
I did notice that! 4 ft. wide is tough!!! I still can't get the hang of that track builder program. I can actually put the pieces of track together faster!!!!
5,581 July 12, 2008 7:49 am
Re: Track Design Contest (39 replies, posted in Track)
Looks like you're still in the lead Monte! Not too hard to win with no competition! How many hairpin turns are in that design? I think I see at least 6?
5,582 July 11, 2008 2:16 pm
Re: Truths of Slot Car RACERS (11 replies, posted in Cars)
7. Slot car RACERS think even their fastest car could be just a little faster.
5,583 July 11, 2008 2:16 pm
Re: Slot Car RACER Truths (2 replies, posted in Cars)
7. Slot car RACERS think even their fastest car could be just a little faster.
5,584 July 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Re: Ferrari 312 Roll bar (1 replies, posted in Cars)
Hey Rico, It's too bad those things are so brittle. To mount the one I made out of brass I drilled out the holes through the body. The brass extends below the top of the body and I used JB Weld epoxy to secure it from underneath. I haven't really had a chance to test it under actual race conditions, but I figure worst case scenerio it might break loose from the body, but still be in one piece.
5,585 July 9, 2008 6:44 pm
Topic: Slot Car RACER Truths (2 replies, posted in Cars)
I am compiling a list of truths of true slot car racers. We're not talking slot car collectors, or people that PLAY with slot cars. We're talking true slot car RACERS. I'm sure all you slot car racers will find something that rings true in this list. I'll start the list, feel free to add to it!
1. Slot car RACERS think; racing is fun, winning is more fun!
2. Slot car RACERS think; "stock" is the starting point.
3. Slot car RACERS think; getting from #2 to #4 is a challenge.
4. Slot car RACERS think refinement is still "stock".
5. Slot car RACERS think improvement may still be "stock".
6. Slot car RACERS are not satisfied with repairs that just fix. Slot car racers think; the repaired part must be superior to the broken part.
5,586 July 9, 2008 6:43 pm
Topic: Truths of Slot Car RACERS (11 replies, posted in Cars)
I am compiling a list of truths of true slot car racers. We're not talking slot car collectors, or people that PLAY with slot cars. We're talking true slot car RACERS. I'm sure all you slot car racers will find something that rings true in this list. I'll start the list, feel free to add to it!
1. Slot car RACERS think; racing is fun, winning is more fun!
2. Slot car RACERS think; "stock" is the starting point.
3. Slot car RACERS think; getting from #2 to #4 is a challenge.
4. Slot car RACERS think refinement is still "stock".
5. Slot car RACERS think improvement may still be "stock".
6. Slot car RACERS are not satisfied with repairs that just fix. Slot car racers think; the repaired part must be superior to the broken part.
5,587 July 6, 2008 3:37 pm
Topic: Fast Cars & Faster Drivers! (1 replies, posted in Cars)
Sounds like Bryan Trachsel has raised the bar another notch out at BASCC! I hear Bryan turned consistent laps under the 4 second mark! Racers...cinch 'em up!!
5,588 July 5, 2008 10:05 pm
Re: Rusting plastic (2 replies, posted in Modifications)
Bryan, you are the corrosion master!!!
5,589 July 4, 2008 12:04 pm
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
Rico we are definately on the same page when it comes to the fuel/tire management system! Like you said, for the BASCC races it makes no sense, they are sprint races. In an enduro type race it does add another dimension, and actually serves some function facilitating driver changes (as used in the PSSR Enduro in Auburn). As far as voicing my opinion at one of the events, I attended some earlier meetings/get togethers and felt my input must not have been pertinent to the objective of the rules, judging from the outcome. As far as the posts here, well you're right, this is probably just too easy. ---------------------------Bill
5,590 July 4, 2008 10:58 am
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
Rico, I don't think you're out of line at all. I was not directing my comments at anyone in particular. My comments are my opinion of the basis for the rules governing the Slot.It class. In my opinion the rules are inconsistant and subjective. As far as cosmetic damage during a race what I referred to was repairing the damage before the next race, as in next race date, not the next heat. But mechanical damage should be repaired before the racer continues (as in real racing). And speaking of real racing, someone needs to show me where, in any type of real car racing, a racer can switch to a backup car after the race has begun!? In response to your post Rico, I must say your cars always look great! ----------------------Bill
5,591 July 3, 2008 9:29 am
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
I Monte, I agree with you 100%. The cars should have to have all the body parts in place at the beginning of the race (excluding mirrors would be ok with me). If a body part breaks off during the race it should be allowed to continue, but the broken part should be replaced or repaired by the start of the next race. If something breaks on the mechanical portion of the chassis (i.e. a wheel breaks off, or you lose a tire) the car should be removed from the track and the repair should be made before the car is allowed to continue racing. This would be a mechanical breakdown versus cosmetic damage. Although most slot cars run fine without one or both front wheels, it should be viewed as a mechanical breakdown in my opinion. The rules do state both front wheels must touch and roll. ------------------Bill
5,592 July 3, 2008 8:57 am
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
One of my last comments on this subject has to do with the asthetics issue. I understand the value of keeping the modelling and realistic aspect of the cars, but with that in mind, and the fact it seems to be of high priority, why would the rules allow the removal of the wings on cars that are so equipped? The wings represent a big percentage of the cars look! I understand removing the mirrors, but hey some of the car's wings represent 20 percent of the body. So if you're going to outlaw "O" ring fronts based on modelling accuracy, I don't see how you can allow the removal of rear wings! In addition, the reasoning of "they're going to break off anyway" is invalid. First off I have not seen a large percentage of cars with the wings in place actually break off. With these Slot.It class cars running as fast as they are, and the heavy magnetic downforce, there IS going to be breakage! I've seen body panels front, rear and side broken already. So what rule revision will be next, you can remove the bodies? So which is it exactly, go as fast as possible, or realistic racing? -----------------------Bill
5,593 July 2, 2008 8:45 am
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
I have heard the Alfas should perform on par with the Ferrari 312s. Oh boy, more RED cars!!! As far as the front tires adding to the realistic look of the cars I understand that, it just seemed to me that when the decission was made to go all out ballistic in speed and performance the "modelling" and "realism" aspect of the racing at BASCC went out the window or was at least a secondary concern. Guess I misunderstood the intent. Goes back to "unlimited" not REALLY meaning unlimited. Again, my mistake.
5,594 July 1, 2008 8:30 pm
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
All hail Master Monte!!!..............er, Smoothy..............oh hell, what the FAST GUY said!!!!
5,595 July 1, 2008 8:27 pm
Re: Naste jelopy class (10 replies, posted in Cars)
Could be!!!!.............and you're not the only one!!!
5,596 July 1, 2008 8:18 pm
Re: Naste jelopy class (10 replies, posted in Cars)
Way cool Bryan!!! I can see 6 of those on my track!!!!
5,597 July 1, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
Rico, Thanks for the advise on the HRS2 chassis. I have one, I just haven't done anything with it yet. I didn't even look at it close enough to realize it is narrower. Been kinda windin' down from slot car season. The nice weather has taken me onto other "summer" type projects. Between summer and babysitting, I haven't put much time towards racing or car building. I'm not sure exactly what the opposition is towards using "O" ring front wheels and tires. It can't be cost, because they cost less than half what Slot.It wheels and tires cost. Is the issue cosmetic from a modelling aspect, or does it have to do with the details of building and engineering? I guess from my point of view if you are going to allow Slot.It HRS chassis, which require a higher level of assembly and modification (especially when you allow ANY body), why would you handicap those that chose to go that route by limiting the basic parts they can use for construction? My feeling is a choice of wheels and tires for the front of a car is hardly a race winning advantage. A bigger issue to me is that there are no rules limiting motors. Case in point, you show up to a race with the latest "hot" motor you just purchased last week for $18 and guess what, a new one came out yesterday for $22 that just put yours out of the game! I like to build a car and have it competetive for at least a season without replacing major components, like motors! So far this season I have seen three motors that were the death of their predecessors. I can play that game and keep up ok, but I'd much rather be able to make small refinements to my cars handling versus leaps and bounds in speed from this months fastest motor. I like the 1/32 cars, but maybe Randy put it best, I need to find a builder's club to race with. ------------------------Bill
5,598 July 1, 2008 7:00 am
Topic: Wheels & Tires (23 replies, posted in Cars)
Here's a copy of the current BASCC Rules regarding wheels and tires:
Wheels and Tires
8. Only slot.it manufacturer wheel parts are allowed. You cannot alter the wheels by turning them down in size.
9. Any type of tire can be used but it has to fit properly on a slot.it wheel. You cannot cut the tires in any way.
10. You cannot add anything to the tires. These include but are not limited to gluing compounds, nail polish, super glue, etc.
11. All wheels need to fit inside the body.
12. All four wheels will need to be riding/touching on the track and rotate as the car moves on the track.
13. You can fix the front wheels, that come from the manufacturer tight, by removing the post caps or sanding the post caps or post to allow the wheels to rotate freely.
14. You can add front independent wheel rotation but have to use slot.it manufacturer parts for the axle and wheels.
I feel these rules are overly restrictive when it comes to wheel and tire choices. The rules clearly state you can use ANY type of tire, but it has to fit properly on a Slot.It wheel, without any modification to the wheel. There are some choices for rear tires with this rule, but depending on the body style (especially in the case of building an HRS chassis) you are handicapped by the available Slot.It wheels. Even the wheels Slot.It calls "hubless" have a slight hub on the inside which limits how narrow you can set your rear track. So in some cases you cannot get the rear track narrow enough, granted this is mostly a problem when building a narrow car based on an HRS chassis. As far as the front you are even more limited. The "ANY tire" rule does not even apply here. In reality there are NO other tires you can adapt to use on the front Slot.It wheels. In the case of the Ferrari 312s you are stuck with the wheels and tires specifically made for that car, although you can buy Slot.It replacement aluminum wheels for the front. Making fronts fit the HRS cars can be a real pain! I used a Fly Porsche 917 body on an HRS chassis. The narrowest Slot.It front wheel/tire combination would not fit under the body in the front. As narrow as I could get it, it was still a little too wide. So here's my point; what's wrong with allowing the use of other manufacturer's wheels and or tires? I found true hubless 17 X 10 rear wheels for the same price as the Slot.It wheels, $8.99 a pair. BWA has wheels available that are narrower and hubless which can eliminate the problems for front wheels and tires. And speaking of front wheels and tires. Here we are with a class that's supposed to be this super fast class and you can't even use "O" ring fronts. Why not? You could actually use "O" rings on the stock wheels, and with the "O" rings that are available at your local hardware store, you would have some ride height adustability on the front. There are different sizes of "O" rings available at any local hardware store, and "O" rings can be sanded down easily to adjust the ride height. 1/24 scale front wheels WITH "O" ring tires can be purchased for $3.98 a pair ($4.98 for the trick drilled ones). It seems to me the rules for this class need to be opened up a little bit, or everybody is going to be running RED Ferrari 312s! Of course that would make the rules simpler; Rule #1 You must use a Slot.It Ferrari 312 equipped with only Slot.It parts. Rule #2 Exception to rule #1. You can change the rear tires to any available silicon rear tire. -------------Bill
5,599 June 29, 2008 7:40 am
Re: Professor's 4-hour Enduro (9 replies, posted in Events)
What a great event yesterday in Auburn Washington! Racing the Racer Ferrari 250 LMs in an IROC style 4 hour enduro. Thanks to John & Chrissy Powers for hosting such an event (with an all you could eat pizza feed to boot!), and to Tony from Fantasy World for supplying the beautiful cars! ------------Bill
5,600 June 29, 2008 7:36 am
Re: Slot.it HRS2 Project (2 replies, posted in Cars)
Rico, Very nice job! Looks like a really clean and sanitary build! The laps times you ran with it are about two tenths faster than what I could run with my HRS based Porsche 917. Are you going to try it with a sidewinder offset pod to see if you can improve it's performance?