5,501

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

Have you all seen the new Sloter Lola T70s? I just got one. Man they are BEAUTIFUL! They have as much detail as some of the more expensive diecast cars I've seen! The only problem is I don't want to put it on the track! Somewhere along the line I've turned into a "collector" again! I hate that!..................But I just can't help myself!!!  -------------------Bill

5,502

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

Thanks Rico, and yes I'll be out from time to time. There's just so much racing going on all around now that I can't make time for everything. In the past I haven't done any racing at all during the summer. These last couple of years I've worked in a bit more, but it's put me behind on everything else. Right now I'm just trying to make sure everything is set for the upcoming NASTE season. I keep telling myself one of these years I'm going to just race with some of the other clubs. For quite a few years I've been wanting to make more OSCAR races. The OSCAR races take more time and dedication for me. I'm not a fast car builder, and as you know I like to be at least somewhat competetive. So that means lots of time commitment for me to race the OSCAR events (again that's me). That's the one thing that has made the 1/32 scale cars so enjoyable for me. I can get the cars set up or built much quicker than I can build 1/24 OSCAR or PASER cars. The 1/24 NASTE cars have also filled a "time gap" for me. They are pretty quick and easy to build as well. Well, enough ramblin' on. I'll see you at the races!  ------------------------Bill

5,503

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

I've found out from doing a LOT of racing, it's not what you're racing, it's who you're racing with that makes it fun!!!!  ---------------------Bill

5,504

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

That's funny, a lot of them look like kid's toys to me! I'm looking forward to trying to make "racers" out of them...... I always tell the guys at work; "you can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit"........... we'll see.  ---------------------Bill

5,505

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Definately not an exact science. Mostly just an idea if the motor is sluggish or not, and a rough idea of how high it revs. The current draw gives me an idea of hhow "hot" the arm is. I've compared enough motors in and out of cars to get a "gut feeling" as Rico put it. That's really all I need or care about. The real proof or test is in putting the motor in a chassis and running it, trying a couple different gear sets. But I can tell you, even with just a "free running" bench test, these motors will blow the doors off my Radioshack motors!!! And they do look like they will run cooler than the Slot.It motors.    --------------------Bill

5,506

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

I had ordered two from an Ebay seller. My plan was to try them out as potentila IRCO cars. After reading the review I went ahead and ordered four more. These things are CHEAP, and NASTE needs a set of IROC cars to run at Kimm's 1/32 routed track in Eugene. I'll try them out when they arrive to see if they are suitable. I'll keep ya'll posted.  ------------------------Bill

5,507

(2 replies, posted in OSCAR)

Anybody know what's going on with the OSCAR website?  ---------Bill

5,508

(2 replies, posted in Modifications)

Message is off to Bob......  -----------------Bill

5,509

(2 replies, posted in Modifications)

Oh CRAP.....sorry Rico, I forgot all about it. I'll send Bob an email right now......  --------------Bill

5,510

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Oops, I'll let you guys know in a week or so..............first hand.............hey, at least they were cheap!  ------Bill

5,511

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Anybody tried out the Jiada 1/32 cars?  -------------Bill

5,512

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, You have correctly deciphered what I was trying to communicate! Yes, they are 90 degrees out of position. And like you I figure for the price, as long as they run!  -------------------------Bill

5,513

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

I have not tried to correct the installation. The motors are cheap enough I've never felt it was worth the effort.......  ------Bill

5,514

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, Yes the brushes do have a concave area on the ends where it appears they should make contact with the commutator. Instead of the concave area running parallel to the commutator it is perpendicular. It seems to me you would have more surface area and better contact if the brushes were installed with the concave area contacting the commutator (one large contact point - versus two small contact point on each brush). When you install the brushes on 16D motors you install them with the brush concave area parallel to the commutator. Then you run the motor at low RPM to seat the brushes properly. It also seems the way these motors come from the factory the commutators will wear more rapidly with two grooves developing. The Radio Shack motor brushes are installed in a skewed manner also.  ----------------------Bill

5,515

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

I don't have any way of measuring torque. I just watch the current draw while I "ramp up" the motor. It's not very accurate but it gives a little info. If you look at the end of the brushes the concave end is turned 90 degrees to the commutator, which has the brushes contacting the commutator on the tips versus the concave surface. I have seen them installed that way on inexpensive motors before. So I was just wondering if it is a mistake? It looks like it. I'm thinking there would probably be less drag, but it seems to me the commutator and brushes would wear more rapidly. Oh well I'm pretty sure in China where they're built they really don't care one way or another!  ---------------------Bill

5,516

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Got my $4.99 motors today. Haven't installed one in a car, just bench tested one. Draws .25 amp at initial start up at 12 volts. Current draw is negligible when it is up to speed, and it winds up instantly. Seems to have good torque and quick response. The motor is very well vented, much better than the Slot.It motors! It also has a very good inspection "window" in the endbell allowing you to view the brushes and spring/arms. Interesting how the brushes are installed on the arms. I've seen this before and can't help to wonder if it's a mistake?!  --------------------------Bill

5,517

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

Well the good news is Randy has a great bunch of people racing at his place and I'm sure whatever you guys settle on will present some exciting racing!  ----------------------Bill

5,518

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

What are the real reasons for going to an IROC format? I agree with George about the IROC format levelling the playing field. It is a good way to ensure the equality of the equipment. So is the other consideration of IROC at BSCC actually cost? If so why not use cars that cost less than $50 each? There are many to chose from!  --------------------Bill

5,519

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

I saw the email from Randy with the news about the IROC series for the winter season at BSCC.  I have become an infrequent racer at BSCC and I realize I probably don't have a good feel for the group, however it seems to me the racers I see at BSCC seem to have an interest in racing their own cars on the larger Marshall Field track.  The cost for the IROC series is too high for me as an infrequent racer. It seems to me it will also discourage new racers who may be interested in racing after the season begins. After promoting IROC races I have found they work well to attract new racers who have not raced slot cars before, or racers who race other types or scales of cars. Slot car IROC races serve well as introductions to other possibilities. Experienced racers tend to like to race their own cars because they like to build and tune as well as race (pride of ownership maybe). As far as equal competition I don't see IROC as being the ultimate answer. I've promoted and raced conventional races as well as IROC races and I have not seen any dramatic shuffles in the finish positions. The fast guys still win in either format. Racers become better racers by running the same equipment (cars & controllers). Being familiar with your equipment, thus eliminating variables, is a better way of improving your skills. As far as equal equipment that's what the rules need to ensure. Well defined simple rules, and a good technical inspection can provide for parity of equipment. Incentives such as a "claiming" rule, drawing motors from a pool, or even lap time "brackets" can equalize equipment performance. Don't get me wrong, I think IROC races are fun. But for the BSCC group I'm not sure a whole season of racing the same cars on the same track is the answer. It sure was not the hot topic for most of the posts here.  ---------------------------------Bill

5,520

(10 replies, posted in Cars)

Hey, anybody tried out any of these 1/43 SCX cars? I just got a two pack of "Tuner" cars for less than $15 shipped! They are UG-LY, but they run great on my 1/32 scale Scalextric track. Not extremely fast, but not bad! I like the "CHEAP" part of the formula! Might have to try the chassis under a small 1/32 body....  ---------------Bill

5,521

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Styrene doesn't give you splinters!...........But with the sticks you get to eat the popsicle while you plan your car!  -------Bill

5,522

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, The popsicle stick chassis? I like it! I have a bunch of cheap Eldon and Strombecker bodies we could use....  ----------Bill

5,523

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Hey guys, that's six for sure in our hands.........I feel a class coming on!   ---------Bill

5,524

(1 replies, posted in Events)

Great stuff Rico!  -----------------Bill

5,525

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Hey George, I didn't read your second posting before I got all excited and purchased four of those motors.....oh well, I guess the $7 for shipping won't kill me...... Thanks for the tip! Even with the shipping that's a good deal!  -------------------------Bill