On August 9th 1988 Doug Haynes wrote me a letter detailing his plan to start a non-club sanctioning body to promote a new slot car racing series in Oregon. Doug called this new sanctioning body/promotional organization Oregon Slot Sports Management, OSSM. Initially six races were scheduled beginning in mid-October of 1988, running through March of 1989. The six races were run at two locations, Pelican park in Eugene Oregon, and Lee Dundas' Dundas Raceway in Wilsonville Oregon. A box stock type class, for cars with Parma Womp type chassis was spec'd for the series. The biggest news of this series was the announcement of cash prizes! Cash prizes in the form of gift certificates at Eugene Toy and Hobby totaling $600, were awarded for series point finish positions first through tenth.  Included in the NASTE Library are the OSSM Newsletters Doug published and distributed at his own expense to all the participating racing and local slot car enthusists.

4,502

(5 replies, posted in Electron Raceway)

Hey Rich, Couldn't help noticing that engine in the background. You got a sandrail?

4,503

(3 replies, posted in Electron Raceway)

Hi Rich, I had a couple opportunities to race on your track some years back.  Your track is beautifully constructed and I found the layout challenging and fun! Hopefully now that I'm retired I'll be able to get back down to Roseburg for some more racing! Thanks for posting here on our NASTE site!  -------------Bill

List updated from Feb. 27, '14 race.

Thanks Rico, me too!

It was a fun night!We had nine entries in both classes, and Glenn Heath stopped by to visit. It was great to see Glenn and have a chance to talk with him. We started the night of racing with the Classic Sports Car Class. Greg Petrolati (Grrenman) raced to the win with his beautiful scratchbuilt Scarab. I think he may be getting a traction advantage from the drool I leave on the track everytime he brings that thing out! The racing was very close, only three laps separated first from sixth. Second up was the GT class and the racing was just as close, well except for Rico kicking our butts by two and a half laps with his Slot.It Ferrari F40! Behind Rico's dust there were only five laps between second and eigth. After the Classic Sports Car and GT Class races the 1/24 BRM Porsches hit the track. We now have five racers with the fine BRM cars, three of which were still around after the 1/32 races were over. Chris Kouba has generously provided TooBad Motorplex with enough BRM Porsche to enable us to run an IROC race for the BRM cars at the tail end of the evening's activities. Last night ended up just being a test session with the BRMs, and some fun racing. It still amazes me how well these BRM cars perform on the TooBad track, and how much FUN they are! So, the 1/24 BRM Porsche Class will officially be on the menu at the next Odd Thursday Night Race. For the racers that do not have one of these cars (yet - we hope) there will be loaner cars available! These cars are just a BLAST to race, so plan on sticking around next race!

The race results:

Classic Sports Car Class:

1st Greg Petrolati 47.3 laps
2nd Gary Goose Gossett 46.8
3rd Rico Locati 46.4
4th Tracy Flood 45.6
5th Bill Bostic 45.3
6th Bryan Dickerson 44.1
7th Monte Saager 40.6
8th Tie Jimmy Jones 39.4
8th Tie Mitch Brooks 39.4

GT Class:

1st Rico Locati 55.0 laps
2nd Tie Tracy Flood 52.7
2nd Tie Bill Bostic 52.7
4th Gary Goose Gossett 52.2
5th Jimmy Jones 50.448
6th Greg Petrolati 50.1
7th Mitch Brooks 47.8
8th Bryan Dickerson 47.7
9th Monte Saager 46.2


1/24 BRM Porsche 962:

1st EVERYBODY!!!

4,506

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

No worries Dorothy, questions are good!

Wadda ya mean, you won't beat anyone??? Are you sandbaggin' ????

4,507

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

The way Dorothy is improving, she might just beat us all at Hammer Time also!!!!

4,508

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

I'm with you Terry, simple is BEST! Our group is all about avoiding frustration!!!

.......................P.S............you don't need any practice!!!!

4,509

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

I agree we don't need a rule to determine if someone should be racing in the expert division. Although during the meeting in August it was felt we did need a rule. That's where the rule came from. It was not my idea, but a group consensus (of those that took an active part in the discussion, which there were few). However that being said, I also know that sometime, someone will push the limit, sandbag, or whatever to take advantage of winning in the amatuer ranks. There are people who are possessed when it comes to the desire or need to win! I think requiring racers to move up to expert if they win the NASTE Challenge Championship for the year is enough.

As far as the format we used at Monte's using the scoring system, I think the heats need to be longer (at least 4 minutes). The break in the middle of the heat needs to be a pause, not a total restart after the break. It should be 1 heat race with a pause in the middle to reslot cars. What we ended up with was two 30 second heats back to back in each lane. As an example of what could and did take place was; I ran my first 30 second segment completing just over 3 laps. The other two racers completed just under 2 laps. My car stopped 1/10th of a lap after the lap counter, the other two cars stopped 8/10th's to 9/10's before the lap counter. Since the race was escentially re-started and the lap counter was reset after the "pause", I started the next segment in last place almost 1 full lap behind. Now I understand the same applies for all racers, but if points are awarded for finish positions the math does not work out. A 30 second segmnent covering 3 laps is not enough time to determine anything as far as driving skill. I understand this type of racing would be frustrating for the amatuer ranks, but it can be just as frustrating for the expert ranks. This type of racing illustrates how good driving skills are just as important as going fast! In a 30 second segment where 3 laps is the maximum, it promotes strategic car placement for the second segment, not racing. In my opinion the heats were not long enough to acturately determine a winner. I'm not whinin', just stating the facts!

4,510

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Thanks for the clarification Smooth. Sounds like you and I are on the same page when it comes to advancing to expert. It should be for the next season, not their current amatuer season. I think everyone will agree with that.

So back to Dorothy's placing in the last race. I see now she was awarded second overall for her score in the amatuer race. However when she advanced to race a second time with the experts she placed third in that race. That would still put her within the expert ranks by the current rules. I think we should take another look at that rule.

I also think that when we run an "experimental" race format we should consider not scoring points for that initial race. In my opinion we should only run proven race formats for official point series races. When I say proven what I mean is; a race format that has been used in prior races, whether it be with the NASTE club or another club on a regular basis. If for instance one of the NASTE tracks decides to run a different format used regularly by another club, the format should be used and scored exactly as the other club does (i.e the format used at Edgewater Raceway in Salem). If a new format, or changes to an existing format are implemented, the format should be tested under race conditions to be sure it is equitable to all. There are plenty of opportunities to try new race formats at races other than NASTE Point Series Championship Races.

Again, these are MY opinions!   Any comments?   --------------Bill

4,511

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK, as to Dorothy's question about other amatuers with scores indicating top 3 finishes. After reviewing the scores for the amatuers; Todd, Russel, Tyler, Victoria, June, Mitch, Perry, and Kira ALL scored their top 3 finishes in team endurance races on the digital track. Those races should not affect their amatuer standings because the finishes were not an individual accomplishment. Thomas scored two of his top 3 finishes in the team enduros. One of Thomas' top 3 finishes (scored as a 2nd place finish overall) was a lap total from an amatuer race at Rico's Atumn Hills track. That lap total gave him first place in that amatuer race, which bumped him into the expert race. He placed 7th in the expert race, however if he could have repeated or equalled the lap total he got in the amatuer race, he would have tied for third in the expert race. However he DIDN'T, and as the rule reads; "Expert Racer - Any person who has placed first, second or third in an expert race with other expert racers".

4,512

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Good question Dorothy. Using the scores as an indicator would depend on whether you raced with the expert class or not. The digital enduro races were a team event so I don't think those races should affect a racers standing as amatuer or expert. Finishing in the top three in an amatuer race would not force you to move to expert. Only finishing in the top three of a race AGAINST experts would affect your standing.  We score the finish positions in order for each division (amatuer & expert) seperately. The points assessed for the Championship are the racer's OVERALL finish position (amatuer & expert together. i.e. you could finish 2nd in amatuer, but be 5th overall). You scored your 19 points in the second race (using the point system + laps completed method of scoring the race) for second place in a race with experts. You BEAT ALL BUT ONE OF THE EXPERTS! .......NICE JOB! Sunday's race was scored using the Full Monte System where you get your best finish in EITHER race (the Full Monte System is essentially 2 individual races on the same race day)...............clear as mud???

So, the interprtation I seek is; are you an expert as of that race (now), or do you finish out this season as an amatuer and start next season as an expert?

I would think you would finish this season out in the amatuer ranks? To me that would be the fair course, because I think you should still be elligible for the NASTE Challenge Championship for 2014.

4,513

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK...........

So she was second overall, right?

4,514

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK, now I'm confused.........

How were the points awarded for this race?

Typically only overall finish position points are awarded, correct?

4,515

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Terry, You are much closer than I on the actual rule! Here it is per the meeting 2013 BBQ Meeting at Monte & Victoria's:

"Expert Racer - Any person who has placed first, second or third in an expert race with other expert racers. Expert status is forever. Experts may not move down to race in amateur only races. Any racer can, at any time, self declare as an expert. Such declarations are irrevocable."

I see 19 points added to Dorothy's Point Series total. That would indicate a second place finish in an expert race. Looks like she now has "Expert" driver rating.

So my question would be; does she have to race Expert for the rest of the season?
Or does her "Expert" status start with the beginning of next season?

4,516

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

No issue on my end as far as the race results......That's racing!

4,517

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hi Dorothy, Thanks again for taking photos and video, and of course for bringing your fabulous treats!!!
Monte & Victoria, thanks for an excellent race day!!!

As far as the moving up to expert rule, I believe what we decided in regards to amateur status was; if an amateur wins the NASTE CHAMPIONSHIP they have to move up to expert status.

It's the Odd Thursday Racing where; if you win you are required to race magnet-less, which is basically joining the expert ranks.

Dennis or Victoria, please correct me if I'm wrong. I know we have it written down somewhere...........

P.S. Yup, no longer on Facebook........

Hey Terry, good to see you here!!!

Junior slot racer my _ _ _  .....NICE avatar!!!  Something you drew I assume???

EXCELLENT advice Smooth!!!

Well put Howie, thanks for your input!

Dorothy, I would NEVER ask YOU to leave!

The beach was great! We stayed in Newport. Yesterday (Wednesday) the weather was even nice and sunny most of the day. We drove up to Lincoln City and I found a 1/32 Mustang model (new in the box) at an antique store for $3.00!!! Also won $240 at Chinook Winds Casino (on a 40 cent bet!!!).

Dorothy, I'm sure you're not the only one with questions. I think some people just don't ask.

I've raced with quite a few different clubs and groups through the years, and one thing I can tell you for sure is; more rules = more problems. Keeping it simple works best. Once you put rules in writing they have to be enforced. Enforcing the rules is NO FUN! Racers break rules, enforcing rules pisses racers off!  I know that doesn't seem right or fair, but it is a fact. As  the saying goes; "been there, done that"! We are all adults (granted playing with toy cars). Written rules for code of conduct should not be necessary. Excessive abuse is dealt with on a "as needed" basis. I have "asked" people to leave before. Thankfully it rarely happens. Other people that seem to be outside the appropriate "code of conduct" just go away.........  No matter where you race or what club you race with, regardless of the rules they have and the format they use, you will experience the same types of "things" you experience with the NASTE group. It's called RACING.....

At the beginning of this season a committee was formed to get the NASTE mission statement in writing, and to get some basic rules down on paper. I guess we should see about getting that finished up!........Victoria, do we have anything together yet?   ---------------Bill

Cool Smooth!  Lookin' forward to it!

The potential for bad luck is evenly distributed between all the racers before the flag drops. After the flag drops it would appear some choose not to take advantage of the opportunity.

"It's too bad some people....", our motto right???!!!! LOL.....

So, the race format in Salem. Traditionally NASTE has always let the track owner set the race format however they choose. NASTE has never had a set, specific race format we have used at each and every track. Sometimes format can depend on the type of lap counting system they use, or it can depend on how their track is laid out. If you recall my TooBad track was not marked off for tenths for quite sometime. We don't use tenths at Rapid Raceway track either. Keeping lap totals to the tenths is more accurate than some other methods. But then again keeping track of 100ths of a lap would be even better (in the early 80s a local HO club had a track marked in 100ths). On my old 3 lane 1/24 track, which we originally started NASTE with, we did not count tenths. We only counted full laps. We held time trials at the beginning of the race, and a racer's fast time was used to break any ties. There are many different race formats and ways to score races. One aspect of Northwest Association of Slot Track Enthusiasts is to bring track owners and racers together by facilitating more racing for a larger more diverse group of people. Part of this diversity includes racing styles, types of cars, types of tracks, and the systems and formats used to conduct the races. By having this wide diverse racing program, NASTE racers have a chance to experience different types of racing as well as getting to know new people in other clubs and groups. I think this has helped keep NASTE around for so many years. I see NASTE as a guest at a host track. We race how they race, under their rules and format, with the exception of IROC style cars and controllers. We are not there to take over their racing, we are there to experience their style of racing. My philosophy has always been, a win is a win whatever the particular format or scoring system a club or group uses, as long as all the drivers are racing under the same rules and system.

I'm glad you asked the question Dorothy! We have many newer racers in our group, and I think everyone needs to understand where NASTE came from. Of course all of this rambling is MY vision. With that said, NASTE is not EXACTLY what it was when it started out, and it may not be next year what it is this year.....................
--------------------------------Bill

You are absolutely right in every respect Dorothy! Everything you mentioned has to do with being able to adapt to and overcome adversity. Everything you mentioned happens to EVERY racer at some point during a season. NO one gets through an entire season without getting screwed (I think it's a rule)!

There are three factors in slot car racing; 1. Driver skill - 2. Equipment - 3. Luck.

In normal slot car racing the biggest variable outside your control is luck, and there is ONLY BAD LUCK in racing! Because if anyone does experience what would be considered good luck, it is always far outweighed by someone elses bad luck! Just ask them! In NASTE racing the ONLY factor you have control over is driver skill. Luck AND equipment are beyond your control. Random driver placement by computer in any particular race falls under luck. Driver placement by first round finish position is based on driver skill. One of the reasons NASTE racing can be very frustrating is because luck is such a big factor. The equipment is out of your control, so luck can be a big factor there. How you deal with the luck of the hand you've been dealt, well that IS the key!

I don't think that resulted in any change?...........