Despite not being around much lately, I feel I have a dog in this race.
Please don't rule out a car model because of one manufacturer. Is anyone running the tables with something other than a Slot.It? You all know my addiction to white, red, and the GT40, and I admit to being highly biased, but I would like to see the Fly and Scalextric versions stay legal- if they fit the class eligibility.
Don't want them at all? Change the eligibility years, but yeah- make sure you go to 1963 because they were around in '64 already. I read that on the internet.
I would like to see us continue to allow podded cars with the pod locked down as I think we would do a disservice to beginners if we eliminate that option. It also allows a broader selection of eligible cars and I like that.
If you're worried about unfair advantages for podded cars even with the pod screwed down, have a sunset clause like we do/did for magnets. You can run a locked down podded car until you win with one. Flat chassis only after that, so you better be building and tuning while you're running the pod car.
Since it was intended to be cars from the 50's, let's make it cars from the 50's. That would bring new life to the D-Type I've had buried and doing nothing for years. But if we did that, would we have to worry about the XK120 and the 55 Vette becoming the new GT40? There will be cars which will have inherent design advantages, but I don't think we should go chopping out the top performing car in each class. There's another one right behind it. The king is dead, long live the king.
If this class is really to be about skinny-tired, slow-motored cars then let's make it that: stipulate a single piece chassis, skinny tires, 14k motor, whatever year range we choose (but not necessarily all agree upon though), and let's get on with the racing. If we want to include locked down pods (and I do), note this as well and move on.
And lastly, for a reality check: we do this for fun. We need to make sure our objective is to maximize the fun and minimize the BS.
Chris