1,676

(27 replies, posted in PASER)

Back to another early chassis. This is one of the chassis I picked from the pile in the early 80's. I distinctly remember it because I remember asking Bob about all the silicone around the stop. He said he had tried using it for dampening and to restrict the movement. He said it did not work out, but he returned to the idea in some of his later chassis, even experimenting with it up to the time he quit building. You can see this chassis was rebuilt many times in an effort to improve it.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2284BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2285BB.jpg

Here is a much later chassis, looks like March of 2003. In fact I believe this chassis would still be competitive today. You can again see Bob's use of silicone to help dampen movement. I may try this chassis out in a future race!

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2286BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2287BB.jpg

1,677

(27 replies, posted in PASER)

This chassis was one of Bob' mules. It had been built and reworked many times, as evidenced by all the soldering residue and cut pieces. There was all kind of experimentation going on with this one! Evidently it didn't work out as I have not seen any other chassis with any of these innovations included.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2280BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2281BB.jpg

This is a later chassis, built in early 2001. Sometime after I acquired this chassis, Bob and I were talking about chassis design and I had asked about weight and chassis thickness for hardbody cars. Bob told me .090" brass was optimum for chassis pan thickness. He said he had experimented with .105" but found it too be too heavy. I did not realize until today I actually had that experimental chassis. I noticed all the holes drilled in it and thought that was odd, so I mic'd it. This is that McFarland .105" chassis, from now on to be known as the McFarland 105!

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2282BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2283BB.jpg

1,678

(27 replies, posted in PASER)

Here is another slider style chassis. This one features a lot more mass in the front around the guide flag, as well as more in the rear behind the motor.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2276BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2277BB.jpg

I do not know when Bob was using this style of chassis. It does however still utilize his built up motor and axle configuration. Still before the machined motor mounts. I think this design may predate the Sliders. I know when I attended one of his early chassis building classes in the early 1980's, we built chassis with this type of hinged side pans. The steel wire chassis rails with a 90 degree bend upwards were also used as front axle mounts, like the chassis in this photo.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2278BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2279BB.jpg

1,679

(27 replies, posted in PASER)

With this Coronavirus thing going on I've been spending a lot of time in the shop going through boxes and trying to get things put away and organized. I think I have found most of the chassis I have that Bob McFarland built. I first started collecting Bob's chassis when I attended one of the races at Lee Dundas' in Wilsonville in the early 1908's. In addition to this particular race up in the attic of his barn, Lee held a swap meet where guys could sell some of the stuff they were no longer using. Bob had brought out quite a few of his "no longer current" chassis to sell. The later ones went really quickly as I remember. At the end of it all there was still a little pile of chassis left over. I have always felt that all of Bob's chassis were works of art, and his ingenuity just fascinated me! So I bought the remaining pile from him. After that I would pick them up whenever he would part with one, or somebody else would be selling one. So here's some old Bad Bob stuff for you guys to check out.

I was away from slot car racing with the PASER group from 1989 or so until right around 1995. Somewhere in that time frame they were racing their NASCAR class using this type of rattle chassis. I remember Larry Cockerham calling them sliders as the side pans would move for and aft. I don't know who came up with these but, it wouldn't surprise me if it was Bob! You can see by the rear axle and motor bracket this is one of Bob's older designs. Before the use of the machined motor and axle brackets Bob would fabricate his own set up using a brass sheet motor plate and steel rod to locate the axle bearing. Bob had a special metal block machined to serve as a jig to perfectly align the motor output shaft with the rear axle centerline.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2274BB.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2275BB.jpg

1,680

(19 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, I took a look at one of the cars in the Sears Marx road race set I have. The motor clip or strap looks similar to the ones on the Cox 1/24 cars with the magnesium chassis. The one for the Marx chassis is more squared off in design. Now that I know exactly what it looks like I just have to find one! I know if nothing else, somewhere I have a complete chassis that was part of my stuff before I got Goose's stuff. I'll look some more tomorrow. Emptied four boxes today!

1,681

(19 replies, posted in Cars)

I have some of those cars. I'll see what I can find out today.

1,682

(38 replies, posted in Cars)

I'm makin' "empty" boxes..............

1,683

(38 replies, posted in Cars)

Mitch58 wrote:

Speaking of my wife she keeps talking about digging in the garden, never about planting anything, just digging. A large hole? I'm unsure of her motives so I keep putting it off.


I have just two words for you Mitch:

POND & RUN!

1,684

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

Tom - extra pinion press yes.

Zack - What tech tools are you looking for? I have some of the tech inspection tools they use for Flexi racing.

1,685

(38 replies, posted in Cars)

Another beautiful and well constructed car Zack!

1,686

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

My nibbler is a hand tool similar to the one in Zack's video. Although mine is much older I'm sure. Hell, Zack may not have even been born when I bought mine!

1,687

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

What type of tech tools are you looking for?

1,688

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

I do have one Stan, but it was mine before I got Goose's stuff. Goose did not have one, or I haven't found it yet, so i don't have an extra. Sorry.

1,689

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

Have you ever started a project and about half way through wished you hadn't started in the first place?

Today I started sorting through some of the slot car related tools I have run across. I had a pretty good assortment of tools that got boxed up for our move here to Vancouver. I have finally found some of those boxes and have added to the stack with tools I got from Goose's stuff. So, if you have tools you want or tools you are looking for send me your list and I'll help you fill what I can. I have extras of most all hand tools used in the slot car hobby! I also have some very cool old vintage wheel wrenches (for nuts on threaded axles) with the old school logos on them (i.e. Cox, K&B etc.).

1,690

(38 replies, posted in Cars)

"I kept thinking throughout that "I need to make Goose proud of this one"."

Mission accomplished Zack!

1,691

(17 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)

I am cancelling the third race of the series originally scheduled for April 18th here at Inslot's Checkered Flag Raceway. I will work with Howie and Bob to get this race rescheduled at a later date. Everybody stay safe and stay healthy!

Good job on the design Al! Ending up with all the lanes exactly the same is quite an accomplishment! My old TooBad track was close with only 3/4" between the outside and inside lane. It came out accidentally because I did no pre- planning of that track! It was strictly a build as I went kind of deal. I think that it was only three lanes helped. The Checkered Flag track has such different radius curves it would be difficult to make it any closer, but the lanes are pretty equal at the end and at near the halfway point.

The course revision I have planned probably won't change the equality in length between the lanes. It will only add about 10 feet to the overall lap length. My main goal is to reduce wear and tear on the "dead man" curve at the end of the banked curve section. I'm hoping this revision may also improve the flow of the course as a side benefit. We'll see..........

1,693

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

SWMBO?

It's the seclusion............

I don't always think....but when I do...........

1,695

(240 replies, posted in Slot Talk)

The Mom "threw it out" stories are abundant in our hobby! My story is a little bit different in that Mom would throw my stuff out, but my Grandmother would pull the stuff out of the garbage and store it away for me! When my Grandparents moved from their home of 40 years I found all kinds of toys stashed away in their attic storage areas!

That sounds like a good remedy Stan. Although the "everybody runs the same lanes" argument does somewhat apply. I guess it boils down to just how exact do you want or need to be? Before I measured this track out in this manner I never gave it much thought. It sounds like you and I may have a similar anal type problem?..........

I usually clean the track off completely and reglue it before a race. If I leave it like this with the rubber on it it stays grippy for practice sessions.

After the short straight in front of the controller/driver's stations the yellow lane starts losing ground to the red lane. It has about a half car length disadvantage by mid corner just before the underpass.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2128icf.jpg

After the underpass and into the esses the advantage the red lane has over yellow increases a bit to about a full car length.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2129icf.jpg

The red lane advantage again increases going into and through the chicane.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2131icf.jpg

The red lanes advantage disappears through the hairpin just before the main straight with the lanes being close to equal at the 66 foot mark.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2134icf.jpg

So what does all this tell me? Probably nothing......I'm sure a mathematician could explain it all to me without the need for measuring it all out. But the exercise was interesting to me seeing the increments marked out on the course. It does seem to me that using segments, or counting sections of a lap for scoring, is only equal in the respect that each racer races each lane. Technically some lanes will have a shorter distance to pick up or obtain a section marker as the sections are usually measured from the centerline of the course. In this case that is somewhat mitigated by the overpass which helps equalize the first half and second half of the course. It also illustrates to me that there can actually be quite a bit of discrepancy in the scoring of "sections" as to how far a car has travelled in any particular section, especially given the fact the car by lane designation may have travelled even a longer or shorter distance just to get into a particular section. I guess the only really accurate way of "scoring" a race is by using the system of moving a car to the next lane at the same spot where it stops at the completion of a heat.

In summation I don't think all of this really means a whole lot or even matters at all. It's just the result of me having too much idle time on my hands, although it did give me something to do for a bit, and give me something better to think about!

After getting the lane length measurements I was able to order new braid for the track. I ordered a 500 foot roll of 1/4 inch tinned copper braid and a 250 foot roll from Slot Car Corner. This will give me a little bit of extra braid for any future repairs. I also ordered a new router bit for cutting the recess next to the guide slot for the braid to sit in. I have a bit, but like most everything else I have I have no idea exactly where it is right now. It could be next year by the time I find it.

When I measured the lanes on this track I did something different to get a feel for how the course change I have planned will affect the whole layout. I used small pieces of tape to mark the track at each 6 foot increment. The result was pretty interesting to me as it gave me a better idea of how "equal" the lanes really are.

Here is the 6 foot tape from the tape measurer I used to place inside the slot.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2119icf.jpg

I started measuring each lane at the start finish line. I marked the end point of each 6 foot measurement with a piece of colored electrical tape. This point is approximately one foot into the banked curve, and you can see how the yellow lane already has an advantage in distance covered.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2122icf.jpg

By the center of the banked corner the yellow lane has greatly increased its advantage.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2124icf.jpg

In the right hand "dead man" curve after the bank, the lanes equal out as the yellow lanes advantage is erased. This point is 30 feet into the circuit, or just under halfway around. The first 30 feet of the circuit clearly favor the yellow lane as far as distance travelled (the preferred distance being the shortest distance).
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2126icf.jpg

After getting the lane length measurements I was able to order new braid for the track. I ordered a 500 foot roll of 1/4 inch tinned copper braid and a 250 foot roll from Slot Car Corner. This will give me a little bit of extra braid for any future repairs. I also ordered a new router bit for cutting the recess next to the guide slot for the braid to sit in. I have a bit, but like most everything else I have I have no idea exactly where it is right now. It could be next year by the time I find it.

When I measured the lanes on this track I did something different to get a feel for how the course change I have planned will affect the whole layout. I used small pieces of tape to mark the track at each 6 foot increment. The result was pretty interesting to me as it gave me a better idea of how "equal" the lanes really are.

Here is the 6 foot tape from the tape measurer I used to place inside the slot.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2119icf.jpg

I started measuring each lane at the start finish line. I marked the end point of each 6 foot measurement with a piece of colored electrical tape. This point is approximately one foot into the banked curve, and you can see how the yellow lane already has an advantage in distance covered.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2122icf.jpg

By the center of the banked corner the yellow lane has greatly increased its advantage.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2124icf.jpg

In the right hand "dead man" curve after the bank, the lanes equal out as the yellow lanes advantage is erased. This point is 30 feet into the circuit, or just under halfway around. The first 30 feet of the circuit clearly favor the yellow lane as far as distance travelled (the preferred distance being the shortest distance).
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_2126icf.jpg