5,651

(10 replies, posted in Track)

I spoke with Jeff Courtney yesterday. He is working to finish up his slot car room and reassemble the 1/24 track he purchased from Larry Cockerham. Jeff is planning to have the track up and running within a couple months! For those of you that remember Larry had named the track "Boss Slot Raceway". It was located in Carlton Oregon, and was moved to Portland when Jeff purchased it. It is a 4 lane track originally built By Larry Cockerham and Dave Smith. The track features a very fast sweeping bank with straights leading into and out of it. It is a great track!   ------------------Bill

5,652

(2 replies, posted in OSCAR)

The new OSCAR website is up and running! It is still under construction but it is looking very good! Check it out here:

http://oregonmodelracing.com/

-----------Bill

5,653

(6 replies, posted in NASTE)

I like that Bryan. I think 6:00 pm race start is good. It seems like in the past that has been a reasonable time to start. The only consideration might be the races that are "out of town" for the Portland area racers, like maybe Eugene where we will be carpooling? Do we want to adopt a "home town" type precedent for NASTE where races out of the Portland metro area would be considered "out of town" races and have different start times?  ------------------Bill

5,654

(6 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hey ya'll, yesterday we talked a little bit about how long our races should last. As I remember we talked about the length of the heat races and we would leave it up to the race host/track owner, taking into consideration how many racers were in attendance. I'm good with that, but how about set minimum and maximum parameters? I was thinking the heat races should be no less than 2 minutes, and not more than 4 minutes. We could even establish a heat race length bracket system based on attendees i.e.;
up to 10 racers = 4 min. heats,
11 to 17 racers = 3 min. heats,
18 and over racers = 2 min. heats.

What do you think? Input.............  -----------Bill

5,655

(3 replies, posted in Track)

You're very welcome George!  ------------Bill

5,656

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Rico, you and I are on the same page!  -------------------Bill

5,657

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Rico I will admit I'm also surprised at how tough some of the cars are, but the key word is SOME. I've seen many different types of cars destroyed in one outting at Randy's. Some of them never even made it to the starting grid. I think Randy is exagerating to some degree how great these cars are. I'll admit they really look great, but from a technical and quality aspect they are no better than the HO cars manufactured 20 years ago. As far as how they hold up when raced, I don't know what Randy is smokin'! As far as compared to 1/24 it's like comparing apples to oranges, but just for the record let's think about it.  The facts of 1/24 cars are, yes you have to replace tires every couple of races. You will most likely NEVER have to replace the chassis. If you have motor problems you can buy individual motor parts to REPAIR the motor, as opposed to throwing it away and buying a new one! And as far as cost, the Slot.It cars are $40 to $50 initially. Now if you want to be competitive add another $20 to $30. Let's see the current rules read "you can qualify and race 2 cars".....so double that figure. So here's the facts......Is 1/32 racing really cheaper than 1/24? Generally speaking NO. Depending on the classes you could find some variance EITHER way! Are the current 1/32 scale RTR Model Racing cars better than their predecessors, asthetically YES, functionally NO. Just the facts ma'am........   -----------------------Bill

5,658

(4 replies, posted in Track)

I think you can get by just fine with the 3 3/4" spacing George. It will be a tad tight  for the 1/24 cars, but I think it would make for interesting racing. Plus it will be more sensible for the 1/32 cars.  ------------Bill

It would be nice to pick up just a few parts when needed instead of putting together a big order.

5,660

(4 replies, posted in Track)

George I think most 1/24 racers would say 4" lane spacing is the minimum. My 1/24 track is at 4" and there's quite a bit of "contact" racing. I've done some measuring with different cars and with the cars in perfect alignment you could get by with 3 3/4" between lanes. But we know the cars are very rarely in perfect alignment! Carrera track lane spacing would probably be a good rule of thumb. Glenn, what's Carrera track lane spacing?  ----------------------Bill

Jack, Thanks for posting this and putting forth the effort with Hobby-Town. Here's some parts I've been buying more than once;
SICH25 Slot It Sidewinder OFFSET motor pod   
SICH01 Chassis Starter Kit Inline (HRS)
SICH04 Front Chassis Parts and Mounts
SICH05 Main Chassis Frame - High Rigidity
SICH09 Magnetic Suspension Kit
SICH20 Body to Chassis adapter cups (4x)
SIGSX18 - 32+34+36 tooth, hex screw M2, ERGAL, 018mm
SIPSMX Sidewinder Pinion Set 10+11+12+13 tooth (6.5 mm)
SIMF10 V12/3 - 29K motor, sidewinder, endbell drive
SICH07 Deep Guide for Wooden Track
SICH10 Race Guide Plastic Track / Deep
SIPA17M Magnesium 15X8 Super Light Wheels, M2 Screw (pair)
SIPA18M Magnesium 17X8 Super Light Wheels, M2 Screw
SIPA01 Axle 3/32"x54mm (2)
SIPA01-55H Axle 55mm Long Hollow (1)
Now of course that list could change depending on the next class that's raced at Randy's! But I know I'll always enjoy building HRS cars.  ---------------Bill

5,662

(3 replies, posted in Track)

Hey ya'll, Saturday during the BBQ I will have the BullRing up and running. If you'd like to run some of your 1/24 scale cars around, bring them along. I will have some cars of varoius types available to play with, as well as controllers. For you track owners planning to attend, I am hoping we can firm up some more of the NASTE racing schedule for this next season. For track owners that cannot make the BBQ, I will be emailing race dates to you to pick from. I am planning for 11 total races, with racer's best 8 counting towards the point series championship.   -------------------------Bill

5,663

(10 replies, posted in Cars)

Tell you what AJ, I'll see if I can put something together soon. I've been thinking about building some more IROC cars anyway. What day, date, and time would work best for you?  --------------------Bill

5,664

(10 replies, posted in Cars)

AJ, they are scratchbuilt, but very simple in design. If you go to the "old" NASTE web pages you can see some chassis examples. If there's enough interest, one day we'll do a build session where those interested can come out and build cars. When NASTE first started we would do build sessions, and in a couple hours racers could build complete cars. The total cost of the vintage chassis (ready to run) is about $15. That is less the model car body. As far as cheap bodies, Bryan and I went to the model car swap meet this past summer, where we were able to pick up model bodies at very reasonable prices. You can get model car bodies and kits cheap there.  ---------------------------Bill

5,665

(18 replies, posted in BSCC)

GREAT JOB MONTE!!!!!

5,666

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Randy, I think you should write for "Model Car Racing" magazine!  -----------------------Bill

5,667

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

I like your ideas Byron. How about you throw a couple cars together and try them out?  Some of the other racers could also build some different types of cars to try out. At your remaining summer season races different types of cars could be tested, and the other racers could try them as well. It's hard to put together a class of car without actually testing them out. Experiment, then build your class rules on what you like and what works well.    ------------------Bill

5,668

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Randy when you talk about "commercial" racing, tracks and cars you really confuse me. I know what you're trying to convey because we've discussed it before, but I think you're mixing "commercial" with "retail". As far as I know there are no 1/32 RTR cars that are considered "commercial" (other than maybe the Parma Eurosport 1/32). When you're talking about slot cars in the commercial aspect, everyone thinks of the large 1/24 scale tracks of 6 lanes or more, or at least a "commercial type" track that is routed mdf. When you talk about commercial type slot cars, everyone thinks of the cars that are sold retail to run on that type of track. Commercial does not just relate to scratchbuilt or hardbody cars (which I would consider well............scratchbuilt). There are manufacturers that make RTR (ready-to-run) cars for commercial tracks. Parma, JK, Champion are a few examples. The cars you race at BSCC are 1/32 RTR cars made for "home tracks" and club racing. Now I know this is just terminology and it really doesn't matter much, but it is the first step to clear communication and like understanding. If you get a new racer that wants to step up to a nice new controller, and he buys one for "commercial" use and "commercial" tracks he's going to have the wrong controller. Look around on the message boards, slot car parts vendors, anywhere, 1/32 cars are not referred to or considered "commercial". By your reasoning everything we purchase would be considered "commercial". As far as these cars being able to be raced hard for years........come on, who are you kidding? I'll agree they could be "played with" for many years if they were well taken care of, but as far as "raced hard", no freakin' way! We've all seen that!   ------------------------------------Bill

5,669

(27 replies, posted in Cars)

AJ, you'll probably need a tire management system for the "loops" and "up the wall" sections!!!  ----------Bill

5,670

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Let's break it down into my simple perspective; 1) do you want to "race" slot cars?, or 2) do you want to play a "game" that involves racing slot cars?. One 1) involves the physical act of running and racing a car you have to some degree "built". It has limited and simple rules that govern the phsyical action. The main rules govern the construction of and details of the car used to compete. The other 2) involves all the aspects of 1), and in addition has additional and more specific rules and conditions which govern HOW you perform the act of racing your car. Both are fun, but both probably don't appeal to all slot car enthusiasts. I'll admit it, I'm "old school". I like racing slot cars like they've always been raced the best. I've tried most all the types of "new" technology that have come along. I've tried many different types of racing formats, and raced with many different racing groups. Some types of racing I don't do often, some types I no longer do at all. Some groups I don't race with often, some groups I no longer race with at all. Some because they no longer exist, some because I no longer enjoy them. It's all in individual perspectives, likes and dislikes................We all have our own. These discussions help us find where we belong. It is much more enjoyable racing in an atmosphere of consensus. After all, is there really anybody that does this for something other than "the fun of it"?        ------------------------------Bill

5,671

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Randy, thanks for wading in! Your input was needed on this topic. After many emails back and forth it seems we have some areas of disagreement, and that's OK. The way I see it some of the new technology in slot racing is taking it to a place somewhere between video games or board games and the "old style" slot racing. Personally I don't find many flaws with the "old style" of slot racing (why do you think it's survived for over 50 years?). But what I have seen in my years of slot car involvement is various sorts of "new" technology come and go. Granted, now some of the technology is more refined, but a lot of it is not actually new. Various manufacturers have experimented with lane changing technology (Eldon had it in the late 60's and called it Select-Tronic). Aurora had a couple of different lane changing race sets in HO.  Oh, and fuel management, both Aurora and Tyco had systems with those features in the early eighties in HO scale race sets. And both actually worked very well! There has always been "new" technology on the market for "HOME RACE SETS" like Scalextric, Carrera, Ninco and all the others to try and "enhance" the racing experience. The fact is they have never really survived the test of time. I expect that is partially to do to the fact they didn't really work all that well. I admit the newest technologies seem to perform much better. But still you have to remember, although this stuff is marketed towards slot car enthusiasts the quality is still somewhat "toy like". The slot car products being produced for "HOME SETS" is NOT high quality. The emphasis on the production of the newest "SET CARS" is on the body. Body detail and appearance are the highest priority, that is obvious! There is as much or more consideration given to collectors as racers! I would bet that sales to collectors is even higher! The focus on manufacturing to meet "slot racer's" interest is on speed. Faster motors and bigger or more traction magnets. The way I see it, they're toys until a slot racer makes them into "race cars". As far as the "technology", I can take it or leave it!     -------------------------Bill

5,672

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

Hmmmmmmmmm, evidently I did not catch that rule. Where is that one written, or was it just a verbal? Like you, I was trying to inform racers they were running low on fuel. Sounds kinda like that turn marshalling rule where you hold the offending car in the air until you reslot the "victim" car.............. I didn't notice that rule being practiced either.......Thank god!!!             Bill

5,673

(20 replies, posted in BSCC)

So it's looking like this must be a forbidden topic or something? I heard a lot more talking and complaining than I'm seeing in type here! Come on, let's hear from someone who is pro-fuel management!  -----------------------Bill

5,674

(3 replies, posted in Modifications)

Uhhhhhhhhhh, Mr. Flyin'.........my hand is in the air!!!

5,675

(11 replies, posted in BSCC)

I like that AJ.  ------------Bill