5,601

(17 replies, posted in Cars)

I see we have 2 votes for "something else" in the poll for 1/24 IROC cars. How about some suggestions for "something else"? I'd like some more options!!!  -------------------------Bill

5,602

(18 replies, posted in BSCC)

Only two races left, but I'm gettin' close with a LEGAL HRS chassis..............Too little, too late!!! Oh well, it's sure been fun tryin'!  ----------------Bill

John, I've already heard it was another great event! I'm sorry I had to miss it!  --------------------Bill

5,604

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

Monte, You are a true racer!!!!!

5,605

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

I don't think I'd have the heart to crash one even if I had 6 of each! Besides, they really don't look like they were built to be run. It appears making them "race ready" was not a priority....   ---------------Bill

5,606

(2 replies, posted in OSCAR)

Thanks for the update David!  --------------------Bill

5,607

(8 replies, posted in Cars)

Phwew, I was thinking maybe it was your "race" arm.....of course that could have been an advantage for the rest of us!!!!  ----------------------Bill

5,608

(8 replies, posted in Cars)

Sounds good Rico, I'll put you guys down. I'm not sure when Bob will want to hold class, but I was thinking probably a week night. I'll let you know more when I find out more.........Broken arm? You or the wife?????  --------------------Bill

5,609

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

No, I didn't notice. I haven't actually taken it out of the tin to take a good look at it. I was trying to figure out the differences between the Gurney and the McCluskey to see if I HAD to have both.....  --------------Bill

5,610

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

Hey Rico, I got the blue Gurney model. It looks to me like the two have a few differences. The McCluskey model has side draft induction of some sort and two scoops on the top of the rear portion of the body (engine cover). I'm pretty sure mine will remain a "shelf queen" also. I can see where one minor "get-off" could result in a lot of damage!  ------------------Bill

5,611

(8 replies, posted in Cars)

Subject: Hardbody Chassis Building Class

Racers, I made contact with Bob McFarland about having some 1/24 chassis building classes. Bob has been very busy this summer but he said he would be in "full slot car mode" in a couple weeks. What I'd like to find out is who and how many racers would be interested in attending some classes for building 1/24 hardbody chassis (I'm not talking about an exercise program here. Hardbody as in 1/24 scale model car bodies). If this is something you'd be interested in, shoot me an email, and please include when you would be able to attend (what days, times, etc.). The last classes Bob put on that I attended were on a weeknight. The classes were very interesting, fun, and I learned a lot!  ---------------------------Bill

5,612

(13 replies, posted in Cars)

Have you all seen the new Sloter Lola T70s? I just got one. Man they are BEAUTIFUL! They have as much detail as some of the more expensive diecast cars I've seen! The only problem is I don't want to put it on the track! Somewhere along the line I've turned into a "collector" again! I hate that!..................But I just can't help myself!!!  -------------------Bill

5,613

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

Thanks Rico, and yes I'll be out from time to time. There's just so much racing going on all around now that I can't make time for everything. In the past I haven't done any racing at all during the summer. These last couple of years I've worked in a bit more, but it's put me behind on everything else. Right now I'm just trying to make sure everything is set for the upcoming NASTE season. I keep telling myself one of these years I'm going to just race with some of the other clubs. For quite a few years I've been wanting to make more OSCAR races. The OSCAR races take more time and dedication for me. I'm not a fast car builder, and as you know I like to be at least somewhat competetive. So that means lots of time commitment for me to race the OSCAR events (again that's me). That's the one thing that has made the 1/32 scale cars so enjoyable for me. I can get the cars set up or built much quicker than I can build 1/24 OSCAR or PASER cars. The 1/24 NASTE cars have also filled a "time gap" for me. They are pretty quick and easy to build as well. Well, enough ramblin' on. I'll see you at the races!  ------------------------Bill

5,614

(34 replies, posted in BSCC)

I've found out from doing a LOT of racing, it's not what you're racing, it's who you're racing with that makes it fun!!!!  ---------------------Bill

5,615

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

That's funny, a lot of them look like kid's toys to me! I'm looking forward to trying to make "racers" out of them...... I always tell the guys at work; "you can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit"........... we'll see.  ---------------------Bill

5,616

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Definately not an exact science. Mostly just an idea if the motor is sluggish or not, and a rough idea of how high it revs. The current draw gives me an idea of hhow "hot" the arm is. I've compared enough motors in and out of cars to get a "gut feeling" as Rico put it. That's really all I need or care about. The real proof or test is in putting the motor in a chassis and running it, trying a couple different gear sets. But I can tell you, even with just a "free running" bench test, these motors will blow the doors off my Radioshack motors!!! And they do look like they will run cooler than the Slot.It motors.    --------------------Bill

5,617

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

I had ordered two from an Ebay seller. My plan was to try them out as potentila IRCO cars. After reading the review I went ahead and ordered four more. These things are CHEAP, and NASTE needs a set of IROC cars to run at Kimm's 1/32 routed track in Eugene. I'll try them out when they arrive to see if they are suitable. I'll keep ya'll posted.  ------------------------Bill

5,618

(2 replies, posted in OSCAR)

Anybody know what's going on with the OSCAR website?  ---------Bill

5,619

(2 replies, posted in Modifications)

Message is off to Bob......  -----------------Bill

5,620

(2 replies, posted in Modifications)

Oh CRAP.....sorry Rico, I forgot all about it. I'll send Bob an email right now......  --------------Bill

5,621

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Oops, I'll let you guys know in a week or so..............first hand.............hey, at least they were cheap!  ------Bill

5,622

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Anybody tried out the Jiada 1/32 cars?  -------------Bill

5,623

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, You have correctly deciphered what I was trying to communicate! Yes, they are 90 degrees out of position. And like you I figure for the price, as long as they run!  -------------------------Bill

5,624

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

I have not tried to correct the installation. The motors are cheap enough I've never felt it was worth the effort.......  ------Bill

5,625

(28 replies, posted in Cars)

Rico, Yes the brushes do have a concave area on the ends where it appears they should make contact with the commutator. Instead of the concave area running parallel to the commutator it is perpendicular. It seems to me you would have more surface area and better contact if the brushes were installed with the concave area contacting the commutator (one large contact point - versus two small contact point on each brush). When you install the brushes on 16D motors you install them with the brush concave area parallel to the commutator. Then you run the motor at low RPM to seat the brushes properly. It also seems the way these motors come from the factory the commutators will wear more rapidly with two grooves developing. The Radio Shack motor brushes are installed in a skewed manner also.  ----------------------Bill