526

(4 replies, posted in Cars)

A very happy holiday to all my slot buddies.

527

(14 replies, posted in Cars)

I'm not aware there is one.

Picture test...

http://www.naste.org/members/monte/T-Slot-1.jpg

What do you mean?

Hysterical.  You guys kill me.

Wouldn't it be easier on EVERYONE'S pocketbook if we removed these cars from the GT class and just IROC 'em?  They don't seem like a fair race against the other cars in this class at this time.

529

(6 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)

That'll make a difference!

530

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

The magnetic effect doesn't work so well inline, you need angle winder for best results on a metal rail track.

Also with lower RPM limits the baby king is an extra lead weight.  It wasn't just the motor that made the King Cobra so effective.

I was there and I saw Bill Bostic!  Only thing better would been to give him a punt or two.  Oh well...

Thanks again Al.  Always nice to take a whoopin'.

532

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

Puzzle me?  Not so.  I've had a few of them, they just don't push any buttons for me.  And as a stock entry, they leave quite a bit to be desired.  However since I did need one to "race" I bought the Javelin as it was all they had.  I'll be happy to offer it some selected updates.

533

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

My first thought is we should use this motor:

http://www.professormotor.com/product-p/hrmh1.htm

Not too spendy and I hear it will be a decent motor as far as having similar performance across the line.  Mitch can probably tell us more.

534

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

Well, I don't think it's any secret that these are not my favorite cars to run simply because the easy ones to get are fraught with parts that will need replacing.  Slot brother Goose has stepped forward to offer an alternative which I find a suitable "replacement" or perhaps it could be run as a secondary class.  Racers could choose which way to run.

Let's see what the rest of you have to say.

1) stock body, Scalextric, SCX (cuda), Pioneer.

2) 3D "CG slotcars" chassis, Slot it motor pod, sw or inline as required, spec guide.

3) A 16k or 17k or 18k fc-130 motor of one brand, (ie NSR?).

4) C.B. Design wheels, same size as existing Scalextric stock plastic wheels, either insert or stock or mag style (only one style for all cars) to use existing front tires and same rear tires we use now.

5) New Scalextric AMC car; hopefully a "CG" chassis will be made, for now we could use as is, or have the rear axle changed over to set screw wheels to match above #4, and change motor per #3. Note: frt whls/tires are different size.

No.  As long as you are using the chassis that came with the body you're ok.

I have one too somewhere.  Oh yes, converted to Scaley Digital at Dan's house.  I'll be running something else.  Perhaps a Sloter car.

Rico, no Lmp.  Wrong vintage.

Well...  once again I've thought about it a bit and have decided to move toward a new class for open cockpit sports cars as follows:

Motor MAX: Slot.It 21.5K Orange End Bell
Tires: Urethane or rubber
Magnet: Removed - non-mag.  Added ballast must be inside the car.

The race group will include but is not limited to:

Slot.it
Alfa Romeo 33/3
Ferrari 312PB
Matra MS670B
McLaren M8D
Chaparral 2E

Other similar cars are allowed, for example Policar, Carrera, Fly, Sloter, MBSlot and others make cars.  Scratch-built cars are not allowed.  Bodies must use original chassis.

Comments?

539

(127 replies, posted in NASTE)

Yes there are.  I'll make some.

540

(127 replies, posted in NASTE)

I think the main difference is the allowance of motor pods and slightly wider tires.

Division II: Elligible cars' rear tire contact patch must be 8mm or less. Chassis construction may be multipiece/articulating.

You are correct.  It's the one brand I try not to have to purchase with a few exceptions.

542

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

The last few hours and what really went wrong...

When the dark gremlins struck and stole our lighting it became apparent there was a real issue - no parts to replace a defective light board.  To Alan's credit he did help us resolve the issue but first they tried to make the headlights work off the taillight portion of the board.  I could have told them right up front that would not work for a number of reasons.  The biggest being that not all LED's work the same.  As an example, the car we put together for Vic's Halloween ride had 4 LED's and two batteries.  Though they were rated the same the red LED's and the white LED's would not run from the same power source.  The result was just red lights.  The whites were always shut off.  Hence a battery for each set.  This is the world of electronics...

So after pretty much trying to kludge this for most of half an hour they put in a battery to run the lights removing the faulty light board.  In my opinion light boards are not a good solution, too prone to disaster.  Have a few dead ones here already.  Never had a problem the other way.

Then it got even weirder, or as some might say, the screw became apparent.

Alan then began passing out small battery powered bundles to anyone having light problems.  No more 30 minute trips to the pits, just pull over and he'll tape a small bundle to your car.

Random crap!  I've been to rallies where they pull this sort of stuff.  Arbitrary decisions that affect the final outcome.  For us, we lost over 30 minutes, the rest lost seconds.

It wasn't the first time.  We had an issue where the car just slowed to a crawl.  Took maybe 10 minutes to decide the issue was actually the lane.  Race was stopped, track was searched, and a small piece of the track braid was found shorting the lane.  Once removed we were back in business but there was another 10 minutes of lost laps.

So when you look at our lap totals remember that we were pretty much robbed of about 40 minutes race time through no fault of our own.  That's about 17 laps every two minutes.  So if you add about 340 laps to our total that's about where we deserved to be.

That brings us to the last two hours...

Chris had to go to work that night so he had departed a little early.  The car had once again needed some work - braids.

When it returned it was once again MAGIC!  I decided it was time to kick the tires and light the fires.  I turned up the brakes and went after them.  Bit by bit we were headed to 6th!  However with about 6 minutes to go my rocket pace took the pinion with it.  The 8th place team got excited - even though their car was also in the pits and a long ways back.  Not gonna happen guys.

Tony got the pinion swapped, Stan took the wheel for the last heat but the distance to 6th was too much to make up - however he did keep us where we were.  The best we could hope for at that point barring some miracle.

In the end it was a great team effort.  Everyone pulled their weight.

The reverse direction of the track actually made it easier to drive in my opinion.  And big credit to Chris.  When setting up the car he discovered that the guide blade was sprung forcing the braid down onto the track.  This resulted in excessive braid wear.  He raised the car slightly and removed the spring.  The result was that we went at least three hours if not more without having to change the braid.  This was a major advantage for us as the other teams were changing braid right and left.  It made our average pace very effective.  Others were faster but we were consistently there and it really added up.

Consider those stolen 340 - 350 laps when you see the results.  I did make mention to Alan that what he did seemed pretty unfair.

As for next year, Mitch, you can have my spot.

543

(127 replies, posted in NASTE)

Congratulations Mitch!  Woo hoo!

Sure.  It's Scaley cars that are unreliable with their pressed on plastic wheels and low quality bushings.  Repair parts can be difficult to source.  The guide blades...

I don't dislike the class, I dislike the cars we are stuck with to use in it.

So, I bought one...  buncha dastards...  maybe I can sell it once the season is over only to find we'll run them again next year and have to buy another one.

Trans Am...  Does someone really like this class?

546

(1 replies, posted in NASTE)

Yes, it was an interesting night.  Thanks to Howie for letting us have the track to play on.

547

(4 replies, posted in Penguin Point Raceway)

Thanks gents, and here's some results:

Slot.It C Class

1.  Rico Locati - 47.0 laps
2.  Monte Saager - 46.9
3.  Dan Fritz - 46.8
4.  Terry Abbott - 44.9
5.  Al Christensen - 44.7
6.  Mitch Brooks - 44.2
7.  Tracy Flood - 43.7
8.  Dorothy Abbott - 43.0
9.  Jeff Fields - 42.8
10. Dana Ray - 42.6
11. Todd Flood - 42.0
12. Jimmy Jones - 41.2
13. Perry Petrequin - 41.1
14. Victoria Saager - 40.7
15. June Petrequin - 39.0


IROC - Slot.it Can Am - Alfa 33/3, McLaren M8D

1.  Terry Abbott - 46.9 laps
2.  Monte Saager - 46.8
3.  Tracy Flood - 46.4
4.  Al Christensen - 45.8
5.  Dan Fritz - 45.6
5.  Mitch Brooks - 45.6
7.  Dorothy Abbott - 43.8
8.  Todd Flood - 42.9
9.  Victoria Saager - 42.6
10. Perry Petrequin - 42.0
11. Dana Ray - 41.2
12. Jimmy Jones - 41.1
13. June Petrequin - 40.4

Thanks to Victoria for a great lunch and all the others that contributed.  We'll see you for the next First Sunday in January.

548

(24 replies, posted in NASTE)

I think you make a cute couple.  wink

549

(15 replies, posted in Cars)

What we get...

"a Special Edition pre production car supplied by BRM and ScaleRacing for each Team"

So this sounds like it rules out the new TransAm cars since they are production units.

Yes?

550

(15 replies, posted in Cars)

I hope a new class would include the original versions.  Having two already i'm not excited to buy another one.  They do look nice though.