4,376

(0 replies, posted in The NASTE Library)

Back in the day we had to do all our flyers by hand! Images such as the illustration of the Aurora Thunderjet HO car, were done by cut & paste (literally) to paper. and then photo copied. This swap meet was put on while I was a member of the HO Racers of Oregon or HORO. This was the second swap meet we held, the first being for HO slot cars only and was held in my garage. For this swap meet we rented a building that was used as a daycare center during the weekdays. We included all types of toy cars in this meet and advertised in local newspapers and the Nickle Ads. The were surprised as the response was terrific! We had request from toy dealers and other individuals to rent tables, something we had not even considered. The meet was a success and we all had a great time! As I recall we had over 50 people show up! That was a big number for toy car enthusiasts  in 1983!

4,377

(0 replies, posted in The NASTE Library)

This flyer dates back to the early 1980s. My memory is fuzzy on this one, so if anybody can provide more detail please do so! The hobby shop was in Springfield Oregon, and unfortunately I don't recall ever even visiting it. My fiend Russ Bessonette lived in the area and I believe I may have gotten the flyer from him. Speaking of Russ, has anybody ever heard from him?

4,378

(0 replies, posted in The NASTE Library)

PASER, to my knowledge the oldest and still active slot car club in Oregon. I found out about PASER in 1984, and at that time they had already been racing for over 20 years! In 1984 and before, the club was known as Portland Area Controlled Electric Racers or PACER. Sometime after 1986 the name Portland Area Scale Electric Racingor PASER was adopted, and has been used since. When I first raced with PASER they were holding races on two different tracks in Lee Dundas' barn in Wilsonville Oregon, and on Bob McFarland's track in Aloha Oregon. Although the document listed as PASER Rule Book in the NASTE Library does not provide any dates, I would estimate the year it covers is around 1988.

On August 9th 1988 Doug Haynes wrote me a letter detailing his plan to start a non-club sanctioning body to promote a new slot car racing series in Oregon. Doug called this new sanctioning body/promotional organization Oregon Slot Sports Management, OSSM. Initially six races were scheduled beginning in mid-October of 1988, running through March of 1989. The six races were run at two locations, Pelican park in Eugene Oregon, and Lee Dundas' Dundas Raceway in Wilsonville Oregon. A box stock type class, for cars with Parma Womp type chassis was spec'd for the series. The biggest news of this series was the announcement of cash prizes! Cash prizes in the form of gift certificates at Eugene Toy and Hobby totaling $600, were awarded for series point finish positions first through tenth.  Included in the NASTE Library are the OSSM Newsletters Doug published and distributed at his own expense to all the participating racing and local slot car enthusists.

4,380

(5 replies, posted in Electron Raceway)

Hey Rich, Couldn't help noticing that engine in the background. You got a sandrail?

4,381

(3 replies, posted in Electron Raceway)

Hi Rich, I had a couple opportunities to race on your track some years back.  Your track is beautifully constructed and I found the layout challenging and fun! Hopefully now that I'm retired I'll be able to get back down to Roseburg for some more racing! Thanks for posting here on our NASTE site!  -------------Bill

List updated from Feb. 27, '14 race.

Thanks Rico, me too!

It was a fun night!We had nine entries in both classes, and Glenn Heath stopped by to visit. It was great to see Glenn and have a chance to talk with him. We started the night of racing with the Classic Sports Car Class. Greg Petrolati (Grrenman) raced to the win with his beautiful scratchbuilt Scarab. I think he may be getting a traction advantage from the drool I leave on the track everytime he brings that thing out! The racing was very close, only three laps separated first from sixth. Second up was the GT class and the racing was just as close, well except for Rico kicking our butts by two and a half laps with his Slot.It Ferrari F40! Behind Rico's dust there were only five laps between second and eigth. After the Classic Sports Car and GT Class races the 1/24 BRM Porsches hit the track. We now have five racers with the fine BRM cars, three of which were still around after the 1/32 races were over. Chris Kouba has generously provided TooBad Motorplex with enough BRM Porsche to enable us to run an IROC race for the BRM cars at the tail end of the evening's activities. Last night ended up just being a test session with the BRMs, and some fun racing. It still amazes me how well these BRM cars perform on the TooBad track, and how much FUN they are! So, the 1/24 BRM Porsche Class will officially be on the menu at the next Odd Thursday Night Race. For the racers that do not have one of these cars (yet - we hope) there will be loaner cars available! These cars are just a BLAST to race, so plan on sticking around next race!

The race results:

Classic Sports Car Class:

1st Greg Petrolati 47.3 laps
2nd Gary Goose Gossett 46.8
3rd Rico Locati 46.4
4th Tracy Flood 45.6
5th Bill Bostic 45.3
6th Bryan Dickerson 44.1
7th Monte Saager 40.6
8th Tie Jimmy Jones 39.4
8th Tie Mitch Brooks 39.4

GT Class:

1st Rico Locati 55.0 laps
2nd Tie Tracy Flood 52.7
2nd Tie Bill Bostic 52.7
4th Gary Goose Gossett 52.2
5th Jimmy Jones 50.448
6th Greg Petrolati 50.1
7th Mitch Brooks 47.8
8th Bryan Dickerson 47.7
9th Monte Saager 46.2


1/24 BRM Porsche 962:

1st EVERYBODY!!!

4,384

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

No worries Dorothy, questions are good!

Wadda ya mean, you won't beat anyone??? Are you sandbaggin' ????

4,385

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

The way Dorothy is improving, she might just beat us all at Hammer Time also!!!!

4,386

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

I'm with you Terry, simple is BEST! Our group is all about avoiding frustration!!!

.......................P.S............you don't need any practice!!!!

4,387

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

I agree we don't need a rule to determine if someone should be racing in the expert division. Although during the meeting in August it was felt we did need a rule. That's where the rule came from. It was not my idea, but a group consensus (of those that took an active part in the discussion, which there were few). However that being said, I also know that sometime, someone will push the limit, sandbag, or whatever to take advantage of winning in the amatuer ranks. There are people who are possessed when it comes to the desire or need to win! I think requiring racers to move up to expert if they win the NASTE Challenge Championship for the year is enough.

As far as the format we used at Monte's using the scoring system, I think the heats need to be longer (at least 4 minutes). The break in the middle of the heat needs to be a pause, not a total restart after the break. It should be 1 heat race with a pause in the middle to reslot cars. What we ended up with was two 30 second heats back to back in each lane. As an example of what could and did take place was; I ran my first 30 second segment completing just over 3 laps. The other two racers completed just under 2 laps. My car stopped 1/10th of a lap after the lap counter, the other two cars stopped 8/10th's to 9/10's before the lap counter. Since the race was escentially re-started and the lap counter was reset after the "pause", I started the next segment in last place almost 1 full lap behind. Now I understand the same applies for all racers, but if points are awarded for finish positions the math does not work out. A 30 second segmnent covering 3 laps is not enough time to determine anything as far as driving skill. I understand this type of racing would be frustrating for the amatuer ranks, but it can be just as frustrating for the expert ranks. This type of racing illustrates how good driving skills are just as important as going fast! In a 30 second segment where 3 laps is the maximum, it promotes strategic car placement for the second segment, not racing. In my opinion the heats were not long enough to acturately determine a winner. I'm not whinin', just stating the facts!

4,388

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Thanks for the clarification Smooth. Sounds like you and I are on the same page when it comes to advancing to expert. It should be for the next season, not their current amatuer season. I think everyone will agree with that.

So back to Dorothy's placing in the last race. I see now she was awarded second overall for her score in the amatuer race. However when she advanced to race a second time with the experts she placed third in that race. That would still put her within the expert ranks by the current rules. I think we should take another look at that rule.

I also think that when we run an "experimental" race format we should consider not scoring points for that initial race. In my opinion we should only run proven race formats for official point series races. When I say proven what I mean is; a race format that has been used in prior races, whether it be with the NASTE club or another club on a regular basis. If for instance one of the NASTE tracks decides to run a different format used regularly by another club, the format should be used and scored exactly as the other club does (i.e the format used at Edgewater Raceway in Salem). If a new format, or changes to an existing format are implemented, the format should be tested under race conditions to be sure it is equitable to all. There are plenty of opportunities to try new race formats at races other than NASTE Point Series Championship Races.

Again, these are MY opinions!   Any comments?   --------------Bill

4,389

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK, as to Dorothy's question about other amatuers with scores indicating top 3 finishes. After reviewing the scores for the amatuers; Todd, Russel, Tyler, Victoria, June, Mitch, Perry, and Kira ALL scored their top 3 finishes in team endurance races on the digital track. Those races should not affect their amatuer standings because the finishes were not an individual accomplishment. Thomas scored two of his top 3 finishes in the team enduros. One of Thomas' top 3 finishes (scored as a 2nd place finish overall) was a lap total from an amatuer race at Rico's Atumn Hills track. That lap total gave him first place in that amatuer race, which bumped him into the expert race. He placed 7th in the expert race, however if he could have repeated or equalled the lap total he got in the amatuer race, he would have tied for third in the expert race. However he DIDN'T, and as the rule reads; "Expert Racer - Any person who has placed first, second or third in an expert race with other expert racers".

4,390

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Good question Dorothy. Using the scores as an indicator would depend on whether you raced with the expert class or not. The digital enduro races were a team event so I don't think those races should affect a racers standing as amatuer or expert. Finishing in the top three in an amatuer race would not force you to move to expert. Only finishing in the top three of a race AGAINST experts would affect your standing.  We score the finish positions in order for each division (amatuer & expert) seperately. The points assessed for the Championship are the racer's OVERALL finish position (amatuer & expert together. i.e. you could finish 2nd in amatuer, but be 5th overall). You scored your 19 points in the second race (using the point system + laps completed method of scoring the race) for second place in a race with experts. You BEAT ALL BUT ONE OF THE EXPERTS! .......NICE JOB! Sunday's race was scored using the Full Monte System where you get your best finish in EITHER race (the Full Monte System is essentially 2 individual races on the same race day)...............clear as mud???

So, the interprtation I seek is; are you an expert as of that race (now), or do you finish out this season as an amatuer and start next season as an expert?

I would think you would finish this season out in the amatuer ranks? To me that would be the fair course, because I think you should still be elligible for the NASTE Challenge Championship for 2014.

4,391

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK...........

So she was second overall, right?

4,392

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

OK, now I'm confused.........

How were the points awarded for this race?

Typically only overall finish position points are awarded, correct?

4,393

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Terry, You are much closer than I on the actual rule! Here it is per the meeting 2013 BBQ Meeting at Monte & Victoria's:

"Expert Racer - Any person who has placed first, second or third in an expert race with other expert racers. Expert status is forever. Experts may not move down to race in amateur only races. Any racer can, at any time, self declare as an expert. Such declarations are irrevocable."

I see 19 points added to Dorothy's Point Series total. That would indicate a second place finish in an expert race. Looks like she now has "Expert" driver rating.

So my question would be; does she have to race Expert for the rest of the season?
Or does her "Expert" status start with the beginning of next season?

4,394

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

No issue on my end as far as the race results......That's racing!

4,395

(29 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hi Dorothy, Thanks again for taking photos and video, and of course for bringing your fabulous treats!!!
Monte & Victoria, thanks for an excellent race day!!!

As far as the moving up to expert rule, I believe what we decided in regards to amateur status was; if an amateur wins the NASTE CHAMPIONSHIP they have to move up to expert status.

It's the Odd Thursday Racing where; if you win you are required to race magnet-less, which is basically joining the expert ranks.

Dennis or Victoria, please correct me if I'm wrong. I know we have it written down somewhere...........

P.S. Yup, no longer on Facebook........

Hey Terry, good to see you here!!!

Junior slot racer my _ _ _  .....NICE avatar!!!  Something you drew I assume???

EXCELLENT advice Smooth!!!

Well put Howie, thanks for your input!

Dorothy, I would NEVER ask YOU to leave!

The beach was great! We stayed in Newport. Yesterday (Wednesday) the weather was even nice and sunny most of the day. We drove up to Lincoln City and I found a 1/32 Mustang model (new in the box) at an antique store for $3.00!!! Also won $240 at Chinook Winds Casino (on a 40 cent bet!!!).

Dorothy, I'm sure you're not the only one with questions. I think some people just don't ask.

I've raced with quite a few different clubs and groups through the years, and one thing I can tell you for sure is; more rules = more problems. Keeping it simple works best. Once you put rules in writing they have to be enforced. Enforcing the rules is NO FUN! Racers break rules, enforcing rules pisses racers off!  I know that doesn't seem right or fair, but it is a fact. As  the saying goes; "been there, done that"! We are all adults (granted playing with toy cars). Written rules for code of conduct should not be necessary. Excessive abuse is dealt with on a "as needed" basis. I have "asked" people to leave before. Thankfully it rarely happens. Other people that seem to be outside the appropriate "code of conduct" just go away.........  No matter where you race or what club you race with, regardless of the rules they have and the format they use, you will experience the same types of "things" you experience with the NASTE group. It's called RACING.....

At the beginning of this season a committee was formed to get the NASTE mission statement in writing, and to get some basic rules down on paper. I guess we should see about getting that finished up!........Victoria, do we have anything together yet?   ---------------Bill