3,676

(8 replies, posted in NASTE)

I guess...........

3,677

(8 replies, posted in NASTE)

We have talked about it for quite some time now, so now we have one. I got it started but to be honest, I don't really know what to do with it now! Check it out on Facebook and put in your two cents worth!

https://www.facebook.com/northwestslotcarracing

3,678

(0 replies, posted in Cars)

Here are some great cars built by Larry Cockerham:

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/100_1153.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/100_1154.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/100_1155.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/100_1156.jpg

3,679

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

At the next NASTE race on February 21st at Al's, I will have some of these chassis available for sale. These chassis are ready to run as they come in the bag, and they will be $20 to club members.

Just to note; I have been running and racing my car with the original tires after just a light sanding. They work fine on my track and Monte's. My plan is to have races from time to time for anyone interested in racing thses cars.

3,680

(5 replies, posted in Too Bad Motorplex)

Thanks Chris! I'll leave a special place on my quarter panel!

Below is an illustration of Goose at the last race:

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/controllerjoke.jpg

Lists updated as of Jan. 21, '16 races.

On January 21st Odd Thursday Night Racing returned to TooBad Motorplex. We tried a new race format with the Race Coordinator Program. For the first Vintage F1 Class race the format worked pretty well, with the finish positions aligning with the manual scoring used to check the new format. The same was not true for the second Can Am race. It appears as in the first race where the diversity of cars creates quite a spread in total laps, the format worked well. However in the Can Am Class the racing was much closer and there was little difference in each position's total laps. In the case of the second race the new format's finish positions were way different and off from the manual tally. So much for the new format!

But the racing was exciting and fast as usual! The track's surface temperature was 62.6 degrees at the start of practice, and 68.9 degrees for the start of the third race (BRM Porsches).

Vintage F1
1st Goose Gossett END  62.4 Laps First Overall + First in Division END
2nd Jeff Fields MD   61.6 - First in Division MD
3rd Bill Bostic SVD    60.3 - First in Division SVD
4th Monte Saager SVD   60.0
5th Rico Locati MND   58.5 - MND - First in Division
6th Bryan Dickerson END   57.4
7th John Morse SVD   56.0
8th Greg Petrolati SND    55.6 - First in Division SND
9th Mitch Brooks SWD    54.5 - First in Division SWD
10th John Fisher SWD 54.2
11th Al Christensen SVD  53.8

Can Am
1st Goose Gossett  61.6 laps First Overall + First in Can Am Division
2nd Rico Locati  Can Am 61.5
3rd AL Christensen  Can Am  58.9
4th Monte Saager Can Am 58.8
5th John Morse  Can Am 58.3
6th Bill Bostic  Can Am 58.1
7th Jeff Fields Can Am 58.0
8th Bryan Dickerson  Can Am 57.6
9th Greg Petrolati Can Am 57.2
10th Mitch Brooks USRRC 56.3 - First in Division USRRC
11th John Fisher  Can Am 55.4

BRM
1st Rico Locati   61.1 laps
2nd Bill Bostic    57.8
3rd John Morse    55.8
4th Al Christensen    55.6
5th Jeff Fields    53.1
6th Mitch Brooks   46.5
7th Goose Gossett  45.7

Over 50 - run at 10 volts in error
1st Goose Gossett 54.9 laps
2nd Bill Bostic    51.0
3rd John Morse    50.6
4th Rico Locati    49.9
5th Mitch Brooks    49.0
6th Al Christensen   48.3

3,684

(5 replies, posted in Too Bad Motorplex)

Thanks guys!

Thanks for "NOT" sharing!

And yes, it was a lot of fun!

Actually as funny as it sounds, I think you could set up a Razor to do HO tires.

Excellent pictures Dorothy!

Thank you!!!

3,688

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Here is a picture of the chassis after I made the necessary modifications to mount the Sportsman body.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1798.jpg

The chassis is soft metal which makes the necessary modifications very easy. I bent the side body mounts straight up to verticle. I shortened them by trimming them with a pair of tin snips. I then drilled a hole in each one and ran a piece of tubing horizontally through the front pair and the rear pair of mounts. The tubing has an inside diameter the size of a straight pin. Straight pins are used to secure the body to the mounts. The tubing was just glued in place.

3,689

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

Some of you may have seen this Sportsman car at the race at Monte's Sunday. My plan is to build three more of these for IROC racing here at TooBad Motorplex. The basis of these cars is a NOS - RTR (new old stock - Ready To Run) chassis. I obtained a few of these chassis in a recent purchase. The chassis themselves appear to be Rannalli chassis, but I believe they were blems. The front of the chassis where the axle mounting holes are were cut too short. This leaves only one possible wheelbase of 3 1/2", where the chassis originally had an adjustable wheelbase with three possible postions.

I did some research and testing and so far have found a few bodies that will fit the short wheelbase chassis. The bodies include various styles of the "Sportsman" type body as pictured above. In addition some of the old Dubro and Pactra bodies or re-issues of those will fit, such as the Cheetah.

After building the four cars I need for myself, I will be left with some extra chassis. I am making these available to NASTE members for $20. They are a good running chassis and I have tested them on my track as well as on Monte's track. With the lower voltages we race at they are a lot of fun. The rear tires are not very grippy even after sanding them, but I plan to have other tire options available soon. I found a manufacturer on Ebay for the Sportsman type body I used. Their bodies are thicker and very sturdy. You can see their products here: http://stores.ebay.com/TEAM-BLUEGROOVE? … 7675.l2563 . There are other bodies available from other manufacturers easily found on the internet.

So if you're interested in one of the chassis let me know. Supplies are limited as they say! If you're interested in a chassis and a body, I can probably supply that also for the additional cost of the body (I also have a few extra bodies of various styles and brands). 
I would also consider selling cars with the bodies trimmed and mounted, ready for painting as the last finishing touch. In that configuration I'd want $40, that's track ready, you paint it.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1844.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1845.jpg

Monte & Victoria thank you very much for having us over for another race! The food was great as was the racing and competition with friends!

"Did somebody say digital enduro???!!!!!!"

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1842.jpg

3,691

(11 replies, posted in Cars)

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1821.jpg

Evidently one of the Tacoma racers does not like it. I do not know what the issues with it are.

I do not know of any tire truing machines that come with their own power supply, including the really expensive Hudy's.

Are there issues with the Razor?

A suggestion has been brought to me in regards to the NASTE "Club" purchasing a Tire Razor truing machine. I bring this to all of you to decide whether this is something the "club" members are interested in doing. There are a couple ways we could make the purchase. The current club funds are sufficient to make the purchase, or we could use a "share" purchase such as Dennis Hart has layed out for the Gravity racer program to get additional funds to make the purchase.

My only reservation is that I am all too aware that "club" owned assets have the potential to creat"problems" within a club. With that said, I would suggest that one person be responsible for the safe keeping of the machine. I would suggest a "check out" proceedure similar to obtaining a library book, with a log book kept to track who is in possession of the machine. I would suggest a designated length of time for possession of the checked out machine. I would expect the person checking out the machine would be responsible for any damage or loss of the machine, both physically and financially. It would also be nice if the machine were available for use on official NASTE race days, before the start of the race.

Your thoughts and comments are needed regarding this proposal.

Thanks!   =========Bill

Lists updated from Jan. 7, '16 races.

It was some very close racing at Al's on January 7th!

Here's the results:

Trans Am
      Monte    69 laps n/c - w/TM
1st Bryan    66.2
2nd Amy    65.5
3rd John Fisher    65.1
4th Chris    65
5th Gary    64
6th Greg    63.8
7th Bill    63.7
8th Jeff F    62.8
9th AL    61.3
10th Terry 60
11th Rico    59.5
12th Mitch 59.4

Can Am
1st Chris    USRRC 72.4 laps & First in Division
2nd Monte  Can Am 71.3 & First in Division
3rd AL  Can Am    69.3
4th Bryan Can Am 68.3
5th Bill  Can Am 66.9
6th Rico  Can Am 66.3
7th Gary  USRRC 65.3
8th Jeff F    Can Am 64.4
9th Greg USRRC 61.5
10th Mitch USRRC 60.7
11th Amy    Can Am 60.6
12th John Fisher  Can Am    59.7

BRM
1st Chris    69.4 laps
2nd AL    68.7
3rd Rico    66.9
4th Bill    63.3
5th Mitch    60

Over 50
1st AL 61.8 laps
2nd Chris    56.9
3rd Bill    56.1
4th Mitch    47.1
5th Rico    34

Thanks Rico for sticking your behind out there where we could kick it!!!

Al has a nice large monitor perfectly positioned for racers to keep track of their progress.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1782.jpg

The NASTE Gravity Racer display was set up in the pit area. Four more shares were issued to new investors.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1783.jpg

The pits at Rippin' Ridin' Raceway
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1784.jpg

Monte Saager, Bryan Trachsel, and Rico Locati in the bleachers!
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1779.jpg

Jeff Fields turn marshalling the back straight and overpass area.
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1780.jpg

Amy Fields and Mitch Brooks doing their part to keep racers in the race!
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/IMG_1781.jpg