5,276

(51 replies, posted in NASTE)

Monte and I have talked a great deal in the last few months about what NASTE's role is or should be in the world of slot car racing. In the last couple of years the popularity of slot car racing in the northwest (Oregon in particular) has grown tremendously. There are many clubs or groups in the area, and many races throughout the year held at many locations. With all these different groups and so many races its impossible to align all the schedules to allow racers to attend all the racing available. For the past few years NASTE races have also encompassed all different scales of racing, which has also added to the complexity of scheduling.

So here's my thought; what if NASTE represented a "sanctioning body" that's sole purpose was to help or facilitate competition between and with different racing clubs? There would still be a "NASTE Championship Series", but there would not be a series of NASTE races. Here's my thoughts of how it could work:

Racers sign up with NASTE to participate.

Each racer's NASTE Championship points would be scored from their best race finishes in (as an example 9) races. The races would consist of ANY race, on any track "sanctioned" by NASTE. So what does "sanctioned" mean? In my mind it would mean any "official" race by any of the established clubs or tracks (i.e. OSCAR races, PASER, BSCC, Pelican Park, Heidleberg Raceway, Electron Raceway, Spare Time, Rapid Raceway, PSSRA, HOPAC). Any official races on these tracks or with these clubs would be recognised by NASTE as elligible. The catch would be a racer can have no more than two race finishes for any one track. For example; if PASER held 8 races, 4 at Checkered Flag Raceway, and 4 at Rapid Raceway, a racer that paricipated in all 8 of those races would only receive points based on his 2 best finishes at Checkered Flag and his 2 best finishes at Rapid Raceway. The racer would still need to submit 5 more race finishes to gain his maximum allowable totlsl of 9. Now if PASER had no more than those 8 races, the racer would have to attend 5 more races with anothe club or clubs to accumulate additional finishes.

I believe this format would inspire racers to try racing on other tracks, and promote interclub racing and competition.

So what's in it for participants?
Track owners - NASTE will post your track information, race schedules, and race reports or just finish positions for the entire year. All we need is for you to send us your information and race results. Track owners do not have to do anything any different as far as how they run there races, how many races they hold, or the classes they race. ANYONE can participate!

For the winner of the championship - You will get your name and club affiliation engraved on our NASTE trophy. This 2 foot tall trophy has been passed from racer to racer for 13 years running now. The racer that wins the series keeps the trophy for one year, unless he is successful in defending his title the next year. And prises! As a track owner I will post a grand prize or prizes that will make it interesting and worthwhile (as if the racing alone isn't worthwhile!). There will be some reward for your efforts.

So why NASTE? Well, we have proven our dedication to the slot racing hobby. We have promoted races with many different racing groups and clubs. Our website has been in continuous, uninteruprted, continually updated, operation for over nine years! .........................and mostly, we're willing to give this a try!

So let's here what you have to say!  -------------------------Bill

5,277

(20 replies, posted in Events)

I'm planning on it!!!!  -------------------Bill

5,278

(5 replies, posted in NASTE)

Like Rico I've spent money upgrading my cars over the initial cost. I'll admit that I've spent way more than I care to remember. As far as the $10 votes, I suspect that's mostly HO scale. However, when I look at some of the cars on the market (regardless of scale) and consider the "quality" of the car as a whole, anything over $10 is too much for many of them!!!! There are quite a few cars where all you're paying for is the body!!! And considering a complete 1/24 scale model kit is not quite $20, I figure a 1/32 body (painted and all) should be worth about $12 (ok, so that's my opinion). Most of the 1/32 OEM chassis, wheels, tires, axles, and guide flags are JUNK! And in reality the motors are about as cheap as they come!!!! SCX has the best quality motors!!! All the rest are "throw aways"!!! HO scale slot cars have always been the cheap route into slot racing. Quality wise, I think HO cars are better than most all the 1/32 cars!!! 1/32 cars are superior only in body detail........but hell, they're BIGGER!!!!  ------------Bill

5,279

(5 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hey, Let's have some dialog regarding the latest NASTE Poll.

I'll admit, I think $50 is too much for a slot car. Have I paid that much before? YES, and even more. Doesn't mean I don't think its too much!

I suppose it depends on what scale you race, and the type of cars. As far as HO I'm in agreement with whoever said $10 was too much for a slot car. But then I like to race T-Jet type HO cars. They should be under $10.

1/32 cars. Now here's some criminal activity! These things should be under $40!

1/24 cars are all over the board. There's low tech cars, and then there's some really high tech equipment on the market. So it depends a lot on what you like to race. Flexi type cars in my opinion are pretty simple and low tech, $40 should be tops for Flexi's. I like hardbody scratchbuilt cars, but the cost of even a body is ridiculous! Model cars have gone out of sight cost wise! A guy should be able to build a hardbody car for $50!

OK, so I'm cheap! Or at least cheap minded............   ----------------------------Bill

5,280

(62 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)

Bob Nakamura sent me these photos of his GTP Mustang.

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/BobNakamura1.jpg

This is one good looking race car! Great job Bob!

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/BobNakamura2.jpg

--------------Bill

5,281

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

OK, I'm ready............
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/scxnascarcot1.jpg
http://www.naste.org/members/bill/scxnascarcot2.jpg

5,282

(2 replies, posted in Cars)

When it comes to slot car manufacturers, I'm not easily impressed! But I have to say I have never received such great customer service as I have from SCX!

I recently purchased one of the SCX COT NASCARs. It came with the RX42 motor, instead of the RX42B motor it was supposed to have. In less than a week from my email contact with SCX, I received a new RX42B motor in the mail, FREE of charge!

That is FANTASTIC service!!!

Thank you SCX !!!!!!!!!!!!  --------------------Bill

Thanks to Kimm for the great race at heidelberg Raceway yesterday! I had a great time kimm! Love your tracks, and it was also nice to meet all the guys you race with, a great bunch! You guys made us feel right at home!  -------------Bill

5,284

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

OK Smooth, The SCX Class is your baby!

We your followers seek your guidance and wisdom..................We seek speed and legality!........................well, SPEED anyway!!!.......................... LEAD US OH WISE ONE!!!!!!

5,285

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

Just readin' over the "BSCC Summer Season SCX Nascar Rules". As you all know one thing that really bugs me is rule changes! Why post the damn rules before you even know what they are actually going to be?!!!.................

How about posting something as "Proposed Rules for Upcoming Class"?

I can't build or tune my car until I know what the ACTUAL rules are!!!

And YES, my "wicker" is already in a "twilly"!!!!  --------------------------------Bill

5,286

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

The gude flag assemblies on the COT cars are different than the older style NASCARs. I don't like the guide flag setup on either car. The whole setup to me is overly complicated, not condusive to good electrical contact, and delicate/fragile. It will be interesting to see how they hold up under serious competition. But I don't see where it would be an easy conversion to something else because there are no motor wires that connect directly to the guide flag braid. You would have to cut openings in the chassis for the wires to pass through, plus have enough clearance for the wires when the guide flag turns or swivels. As I read the rules, cutting holes in the chassis is not an allowable option. I say the guide flags should be raced as installed by the factory - STOCK. Because, if someone were to modify theirs, and it turned out to be better, it would be banned anyway if it were deemed "too hard to do"...........

5,287

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

Is it a SCX screw??????????....................an SCX spacer????????


Sorry, I can't help myself sometimes!...........................

5,288

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

Sounds legal to me Rico!!!!..................but then, you are aware of my track record when it comes to "RULES" and interpretations!!!!!!!

5,289

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

In an effort to remain legal, I'm going to need some clarification regarding rule number 9:

9. Brushes and guideflags have to be SCX brand. You can remove the springyness of the guide flags so they sit lower by securing them within the collar. But you can't alter the flag itself. You can go with the double brush setup or a single brush setup. Any brand of contact braid may be used. The standard SCX braids may also be re-woven.

5,290

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

OHhhhhh, NOW you tell me!!!!!................................

5,291

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

BTW, the motors are a b___h to get out of these new chassis! They fit VERY tight in the motor pods and require some serious prying!!!

5,292

(25 replies, posted in BSCC)

The way I see it is if the majority of the cars have the older motor, and we are racing these cars non-magnetic, why go to the extra expense of the hotter motor? My preference would be the old motor. Faster is not necessarily better!

So I tore my two new cars down to see what motor is in them. Here's the lowdown:

Texaco /Havoline Dodge Charger #42 (Juan Pablo Montoya) REF 63420 - RX42B motor.

AT&T Impala SS #31 COT (Jeff Burton) REF 63400 - RX42 motor.

So how do I know if the COT was supposed to come with the RX42B or not? The bottom of both boxes are dated 2008.

Also just to note; the biggest difference between the COT chassis and the standard NASCAR chassis is the COT has independently rotating front wheels, the older standard chassis has a solid front axle.

On another note, my old, older style SCX NASCAR ran .10 second laps faster than my new #42 NASCAR on the BullRing........................and that was with the old RX42 motor............

So whatever the decision is, let's decide, set the rules (and leave them the hell alone!) so we can start buildin' and testin' !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  ---------------------Bill

YES! Great commentary!!!

Magnets belong in motors!!!!

5,294

(62 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)

......And, a few more. Nice car Beau!!!

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/beau32812.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/beau32814.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/beau32817.jpg

5,295

(62 replies, posted in Rapid Raceway)

Here's a few of the photos I got of Beau Frazier's car:

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/beau3281.jpg

http://www.naste.org/members/bill/beau3285.jpg

FOR SALE - 6 lane routed MDF (commercial type) Slot Car track. The track is located in Fairview Oregon. The track comes apart in 6 sections to facilitate moving. The track was designed to be easily moved when it was originally built. The track has copper tinned braid for electrical contact to the cars. The track comes complete with track power supply and a computerized lap counting system. The overall footprint of the track is roughly 19 feet by 12 feet. This is a nice track! The track is still up and in use if you'd like to try it out before purchasing. Get it all for $2,100. Call if you're interested; Bill 503-803-6850.

5,297

(2 replies, posted in NASTE)

Me too Rico! I know you and AJ would have a great time! I'm going to work on the carpool info and details. Depending on who can go, we could rendezvous at the Denny's on I-5 at Wilsonville (where we would meet up for the chassis classes at Bob's). I'll have the Toaster and three available seats. I could also pick up riders along the way.

5,298

(2 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hey Ya'll, I made a trip down to Kimm Marshall's Heidelberg Raceway in Eugene today. What a GREAT place! Two beautiful tracks to play on, surrounded by racing memorabilia of all kinds!

Kimm's 1/24 track is deceivingly fast! His ROUTED, magna-braid 1/32 track is super smooth and challenging!

If you have not raced on a MDF Routed, Magna-Braid track DESIGNED for 1/32 scale slot cars, YOU ARE MISSING THE BOAT! I warn you, once you race on Kimm's track you will want one!

The NASTE race at Heidelberg Raceway has been rescheduled for Saturday April 18th. If you can make this race I guarantee it will be worth the trip! You will not be disappointed!

We will be holding one race on each track. You will have two chances to take the hardware home, one in 1/32 and one in 1/24. Both races will be IROC style races.

The 1/24 race will be 4.5" wheelbase flexi type chassis, lexan bodied NASCARs. These things are REALLY fast on Kimm's track!

The 1/32 race will be mildly modified Carrera Aston Martin Vanquish's. These cars will surprise you! They do not handle like STOCK Carrera cars! And on Kimm's track they are a riot!

So get ready, the race is on! There will be local Eugene racers for us to meet and race against. They may have a track advantage, but we may have the car advantage?

Will we fare better than we did at Pelican Park? Maybe some NASTE Thursday practice before the 18th will help?

Mark your calendars, make some plans! This one is going to be great!  -------------------------Bill

5,299

(0 replies, posted in NASTE)

Hey Smooth, Great poll! I punish the equipment, does that count????

5,300

(41 replies, posted in NASTE)

HEY, who's red handled scissors did I end up with? They were left at my place sometime ago........   ----------------Bill